Levers can turn a small applied force into a large force. The same amount of work is done, though. So the small force must be applied over a larger distance, and the large force acts for a small distance. I think for the second way: you can configure a lever to operate in the same direction as the applied force, or in the opposite direction, depending on where the pivot point is. So it can change the direction of the force.
Yes, a third-class lever does not increase the distance that a load can be moved. In a third-class lever, the effort is in between the load and the fulcrum, resulting in a greater mechanical advantage but less distance traveled by the load compared to the effort.
First-class levers increase or decrease the force applied, second-class levers increase the force applied, and third-class levers increase the distance moved.
'Mechanical Advantage' of a 3rd class lever is always less than 1. Force on the resistance is less than the effort force. Distance moved by the load is greater than distance moved by the effort. Eg: fishing pole.
No, tipping your head back is an example of a third-class lever. In a third-class lever, the effort force is between the fulcrum (joint) and the load (head) being moved.
A CD is a class 1 lever, where the fulcrum (pivot point) is located between the effort (force applied) and the load (object being moved).
Yes, a third-class lever does not increase the distance that a load can be moved. In a third-class lever, the effort is in between the load and the fulcrum, resulting in a greater mechanical advantage but less distance traveled by the load compared to the effort.
First-class levers increase or decrease the force applied, second-class levers increase the force applied, and third-class levers increase the distance moved.
'Mechanical Advantage' of a 3rd class lever is always less than 1. Force on the resistance is less than the effort force. Distance moved by the load is greater than distance moved by the effort. Eg: fishing pole.
No, tipping your head back is an example of a third-class lever. In a third-class lever, the effort force is between the fulcrum (joint) and the load (head) being moved.
A CD is a class 1 lever, where the fulcrum (pivot point) is located between the effort (force applied) and the load (object being moved).
because In a Type 1 Lever, the pivot (fulcrum) is between the effort and the load. In an off-center type one lever (like a pliers), the load is larger than the effort, but is moved through a smaller distance. Examples of common tools (and other items) that use a type 1 lever include and in a Type 3 Lever, the effort is between the pivot (fulcrum) and the load.
Yes, a shovel is a first-class lever because the fulcrum is between the effort (force) applied by the user and the load (the material being moved).
No. In a first class lever, the fulcrum is in the middle. Such as see-saws.
The human arm is primarily a third-class lever. The effort (force) is generated by the muscles in the arm, the fulcrum is the elbow joint, and the load (resistance) is the object being lifted or moved by the hand.
The correct order of components in a first-class lever is: the fulcrum (pivot point), the effort (applied force), and the load (resistance being moved).
Your arm acts as a third-class lever, with the elbow as the fulcrum. In this lever system, the effort (force applied by muscles) is between the fulcrum (elbow) and the load (object being moved). This allows for a large range of motion but requires more force to move the load.
A seesaw is a type of Class 1 lever, where the fulcrum is located between the effort (the force applied to move the lever) and the load (the object being moved). This means that the force applied on one end of the seesaw will cause movement on the other end.