No, there is not such thing as an ideal machine; it's just an idea.
A machine with 100 percent mechanical efficiency would be called an ideal machine, as it would have no energy losses due to friction, heat, or other inefficiencies.
If a machine was 100 percent efficient, the AMA would be equal to the IMA. This is because in an ideal scenario where the machine loses no energy to friction or other factors, the AMA (actual mechanical advantage) would be the same as the IMA (ideal mechanical advantage).
A real machine is a physical device with moving parts that may have friction and energy losses, resulting in reduced efficiency. An ideal machine is a theoretical concept that assumes no energy losses due to friction or other factors, resulting in 100% efficiency. Ideal machines are used for theoretical calculations and comparisons, while real machines consider practical limitations and inefficiencies.
If the input work equals the output work, the machine has 100% efficiency, meaning it is able to convert all the input work into useful output work without any losses. An efficient machine is desirable as it maximizes the output for a given input.
An ideal machine operates without any energy losses, friction, or other inefficiencies, providing 100% efficiency at all times. In contrast, an actual machine experiences energy losses due to factors such as friction, heat, and inefficiencies in its components, resulting in less than 100% efficiency in its operation.
100 Percent.
A machine with 100 percent mechanical efficiency would be called an ideal machine, as it would have no energy losses due to friction, heat, or other inefficiencies.
No heat loss = maximum output. There would be no loss of energy, which is an ideal condition.
No physical machine is ideal. Friction is always a loss of energy.
If a machine was 100 percent efficient, the AMA would be equal to the IMA. This is because in an ideal scenario where the machine loses no energy to friction or other factors, the AMA (actual mechanical advantage) would be the same as the IMA (ideal mechanical advantage).
A ideal machine would have an efficiency of 100 percent. For this to be possible, the amount of energy output by the machine would equal the amount of energy input. Because all machines have physical parts, some energy is lost to friction, heat dissipation, or other factors, so no machine can be an ideal machine.
In ideal machine input is equal to output . The efficiency of ideal machine is 100% . In real machine input is not equal to output .The efficiency of ideal machine in not 100% . In ideal machine there is no lose of energy . In real machine there is lose of energy . In real machine there is no friction . While in real machine there is friction .
In ideal machine input is equal to output . The efficiency of ideal machine is 100% . In real machine input is not equal to output .The efficiency of ideal machine in not 100% . In ideal machine there is no lose of energy . In real machine there is lose of energy . In real machine there is no friction . While in real machine there is friction .
A real machine is a physical device with moving parts that may have friction and energy losses, resulting in reduced efficiency. An ideal machine is a theoretical concept that assumes no energy losses due to friction or other factors, resulting in 100% efficiency. Ideal machines are used for theoretical calculations and comparisons, while real machines consider practical limitations and inefficiencies.
If a machine has 100 percent efficiency, the output work = the input work. That's actually basically what the efficiency of a machine is - output work / input work * 100.
If the input work equals the output work, the machine has 100% efficiency, meaning it is able to convert all the input work into useful output work without any losses. An efficient machine is desirable as it maximizes the output for a given input.
If you are talking about machine, then NO. Perfect machine is practically impossible to create.