No, just that all of it was created at (during?) the "big bang"
(which was very small and quite possibly soundless.)
.
True. Modern science explains the origin of energy as emerging from the Big Bang, during which all energy in the universe was created. This energy has subsequently transformed and evolved through various processes and interactions.
Modern science can trace the origin of energy in the universe back to the Big Bang, where all the energy in the universe was created. The formation of stars and galaxies then transformed this energy into various forms like light and heat that we observe today.
The same units can be used for any type of energy - and in modern science, the same units ARE used. For example, the SI unit for energy is the joule.
I have done some reading on this topic recently, and it seems that most experts in the field would agree that energy conservation is NOT valid on a large scale, i.e., in certain specific situations in General Relativity. This is because the conditions for Nöther's Theorem are not satisfied. Though I don't exactly understand how they are not satisfied, that's what leading cosmologists say.An alternative explanation is that the total energy of the Universe is zero; i.e., the positive energy we observe is somehow counteracted by negative energy. This is possible with potential energy, for example.
Albert Einstein was important for his groundbreaking contributions to physics, particularly his theory of relativity that revolutionized our understanding of space, time, and gravity. He also made key contributions to the development of quantum theory and the explanation of the photoelectric effect, which led to the development of modern electronics. Additionally, his work laid the foundation for advancements in technology such as nuclear energy and lasers.
True. Modern science explains the origin of energy as emerging from the Big Bang, during which all energy in the universe was created. This energy has subsequently transformed and evolved through various processes and interactions.
Not with modern science, however advances in energy weaponry have been made though only to the point of lasers. Not localized, compact energy constructs.
Modern science can trace the origin of energy in the universe back to the Big Bang, where all the energy in the universe was created. The formation of stars and galaxies then transformed this energy into various forms like light and heat that we observe today.
No 'father of modern science' shouldn't be capitalized.
The Story of Modern Science was created in 1923.
Miracles of Modern Science was created in 2005.
Modern Science - band - was created in 2007.
The same units can be used for any type of energy - and in modern science, the same units ARE used. For example, the SI unit for energy is the joule.
How one culture contributed to modern science
No. It cannot be scientifically proven. Also it cannot be scientifically disproved.Yes, it is possible through meditation. Every living organism has an Aura, and this can be observed and measured using Krilian photography. In Alchemy, there are two distinct flows of universal energy as Underground flow and the Celestial flow.In modern science, it is an accepted fact that there is a form of energy that exists, but cannot be comprehended by Science, and Gray matter that is also invisible to Science. But Modern Scientists accept the fact that there is something out there that they cannot comprehend in terms of science.
The disadvantage of modern science is that there are a lot of regulations on it. Also with modern science sometimes the cost of health care can sky rocket because of the new discovered or implemented technology.
I have done some reading on this topic recently, and it seems that most experts in the field would agree that energy conservation is NOT valid on a large scale, i.e., in certain specific situations in General Relativity. This is because the conditions for Nöther's Theorem are not satisfied. Though I don't exactly understand how they are not satisfied, that's what leading cosmologists say.An alternative explanation is that the total energy of the Universe is zero; i.e., the positive energy we observe is somehow counteracted by negative energy. This is possible with potential energy, for example.