A single force cannot exist because forces are interactions between two or more objects. For a force to be present, there must be an object or system exerting the force and another object or system experiencing the force. It is this interaction that defines and characterizes a force.
A single force cannot exist because, according to Newton's third law of motion, every action has an equal and opposite reaction. This means that forces always occur in pairs. Therefore, if there is a force acting on an object, there must be another force exerted in the opposite direction.
In physics, a single force can be composed of multiple individual forces acting in different directions. For example, a net force on an object is the vector sum of all the individual forces acting on it. So while a single force can be the result of multiple components, it is not possible for a single isolated force to exist without any other forces present.
No, a body will not be in equilibrium under the action of a single force. For a body to be in equilibrium, the vector sum of all the forces acting on the body must be zero. A single force cannot balance itself out, so it will cause the body to accelerate in the direction of the force.
A couple or moment system of forces cannot be reduced to a single force because it involves two equal and opposite parallel forces that produce a rotation around a point rather than a translation.
This is a philosophical paradox as such a scenario cannot exist in reality. An immovable object cannot exist at the same time as an unstoppable force because they contradict each other in terms of their properties. The result of their collision is a topic of debate and imagination rather than a scientifically solvable question.
A single force cannot exist because, according to Newton's third law of motion, every action has an equal and opposite reaction. This means that forces always occur in pairs. Therefore, if there is a force acting on an object, there must be another force exerted in the opposite direction.
because a force cannot exist without the support of another force. Right? so if this answer isn't what you were looking for, why take the time to post a question on "answer.com" when you can just go to google. every time i have a question about something, that's where i go. :)
A body is in equilibrium when the force on it is zero, thus if a single force is on the body, the force must be zero or the body will not be equilibrium.
A body is in equilibrium when the force on it is zero, thus if a single force is on the body, the force must be zero or the body will not be equilibrium.
In physics, a single force can be composed of multiple individual forces acting in different directions. For example, a net force on an object is the vector sum of all the individual forces acting on it. So while a single force can be the result of multiple components, it is not possible for a single isolated force to exist without any other forces present.
The effect of a torque is to produce angular acceleration and that of the force is to produce linear acceleration. Since the effects of both torque and force are entirely different, therefore, a torque cannot be balanced by a single force.
No, a body will not be in equilibrium under the action of a single force. For a body to be in equilibrium, the vector sum of all the forces acting on the body must be zero. A single force cannot balance itself out, so it will cause the body to accelerate in the direction of the force.
A couple or moment system of forces cannot be reduced to a single force because it involves two equal and opposite parallel forces that produce a rotation around a point rather than a translation.
One big reason is because centrifugal force doesn't explain circular motion, and the other one is because centrifugal force doesn't even exist. I can't think of a way to make an object move in a circle by pulling it from outside of the circle.
This is a philosophical paradox as such a scenario cannot exist in reality. An immovable object cannot exist at the same time as an unstoppable force because they contradict each other in terms of their properties. The result of their collision is a topic of debate and imagination rather than a scientifically solvable question.
-- "Inertia" is not a force. -- There is no such thing as a single balanced force or a single unbalanced force.
No