Since the radius of Earth is far greater(rough: 6400km) than a few 100m, you can neglect that distance and still have g=9.80 (g=GM/(R^2), with R being the radius of earth, the extra few hundred metres has a neglible effect on the result of the calculation
Velocity is parallel to acceleration when an object is moving with constant speed in a straight line, as the direction of the velocity and acceleration vectors are aligned. This means that the object's speed may be constant, but its direction can change.
The velocity and acceleration of a body are parallel when the body is moving along a straight path with a constant speed. In this case, the velocity is constant, and since acceleration is the rate of change of velocity, it is zero. Therefore, both the velocity and acceleration vectors are parallel and pointing in the same direction.
No, you are not accelerating if you are traveling in a constant direction with a constant speed. Acceleration is the rate of change of velocity, so if your velocity remains constant, there is no acceleration.
Yes, it is possible to have zero acceleration with a non-zero velocity. This occurs when the velocity is constant. On a velocity-time graph, a flat, horizontal line represents constant velocity, while a zero slope (flat line) represents zero acceleration.
Some examples of acceleration questions that can be used to assess students' understanding of the concept include: What is the formula for calculating acceleration? How does acceleration differ from velocity? Can an object have acceleration if its speed is constant? Explain. Describe a scenario where an object experiences positive acceleration. How does mass affect an object's acceleration when the same force is applied?
Velocity is parallel to acceleration when an object is moving with constant speed in a straight line, as the direction of the velocity and acceleration vectors are aligned. This means that the object's speed may be constant, but its direction can change.
The velocity and acceleration of a body are parallel when the body is moving along a straight path with a constant speed. In this case, the velocity is constant, and since acceleration is the rate of change of velocity, it is zero. Therefore, both the velocity and acceleration vectors are parallel and pointing in the same direction.
No, you are not accelerating if you are traveling in a constant direction with a constant speed. Acceleration is the rate of change of velocity, so if your velocity remains constant, there is no acceleration.
Yes, it is possible to have zero acceleration with a non-zero velocity. This occurs when the velocity is constant. On a velocity-time graph, a flat, horizontal line represents constant velocity, while a zero slope (flat line) represents zero acceleration.
Some examples of acceleration questions that can be used to assess students' understanding of the concept include: What is the formula for calculating acceleration? How does acceleration differ from velocity? Can an object have acceleration if its speed is constant? Explain. Describe a scenario where an object experiences positive acceleration. How does mass affect an object's acceleration when the same force is applied?
d(t)=Vi(t)+((1/2)(a*t^2)) I just can't find anywhere to explain where that 1/2 constant comes from.
Yes, it's acceleration will be zero because the velocity isn't changing, but it has an acceleration. Think of it in terms of integration and derivation. Acceleration is the derivative of velocity, so if velocity is a constant number the acceleration must be zero.Generally if value of acceleration is "zero", we consider it to mean that there is NO acceleration. The question that was actually answered above was "Can acceleration be DEFINED fora body moving at constant speed?"It is possible for an object to be moving at a constant angular speed and yet have an effective acceleration in a tangential direction.===========================================Both of you guys are missing the most important point here, with the resultthat you have to twist your own arm almost to the point of dislocation in orderto state an answer.The essential underlying consideration is that, contrary to popular misconception,"acceleration" does not mean 'speeding up', or even 'changing speed'. It means"change in velocity", and "velocity" means "speed anddirection". If either speedor direction change, then that means there is 'acceleration'.The answer to the question is simple, and almost entirely non-technical. It is:"Yes, because 'acceleration' means change of either speed or direction. So, ifthe direction of the body's motion is changing, then the body has acceleration,even if its speed is constant."
When a body moves with uniform, its acceleration is is constant if v(m/s) t(s) a(m/s2) 4 1 0 8 2 4 12 3 4 16 4 4 (8-4/1)=4 12-8/1=4 hence acceleration is constant.
Yes, an object can be accelerated even if it is moving at a constant speed if the direction of its velocity changes. This change in velocity, even if the magnitude of speed remains constant, indicates acceleration. For example, if a car is moving around a circular track at a constant speed, its direction is changing constantly, resulting in acceleration.
When a body moves with constant velocity, the net force acting on it is zero as there is no acceleration. The magnitude of the force applied to keep the body moving is equal to the frictional force opposing its motion. This ensures that the forces are balanced, resulting in a constant velocity without any acceleration.
In contrast, for an ellipse it is the ''sum'' of these distances that is a constant
vgvgvyhb