Motion is considered relative because how an object appears to be moving depends on the observer's frame of reference. Two observers moving at different speeds relative to each other will perceive the motion of an object differently. This concept is a fundamental principle of Einstein's theory of relativity.
The statement "rest and motion are relative terms" means that whether an object is considered at rest or in motion depends on the observer's frame of reference. For example, a person sitting on a bus is at rest relative to the bus, but in motion relative to a person standing on the street. This illustrates that rest and motion are relative concepts.
Actually sitting on the earth we feel as if we are at rest. But relative to the pole star we are moving along a circular path. Also relative to the sun we are moving along an elliptical path around the sun. So actually speaking we are not at rest. In the same nothing is stationary. Everything is in motion. Rest means only a relative term.
Yes, motion and rest are relative terms because an object can be considered in motion or at rest depending on the observer's frame of reference. An object at rest in one frame of reference may appear to be in motion in another frame of reference.
Friction opposes the relative motion of surfaces in contact. It acts in the direction opposite to the direction of motion or tendency of motion between two surfaces.
Motion is relative. That's because you can't define motion because it's relative to the observer's point of view. :D Oh & you have to have a reference frame b/c you can't answer, "are you moving?" It has to be "are you moving compared to ______."
The statement "rest and motion are relative terms" means that whether an object is considered at rest or in motion depends on the observer's frame of reference. For example, a person sitting on a bus is at rest relative to the bus, but in motion relative to a person standing on the street. This illustrates that rest and motion are relative concepts.
Actually sitting on the earth we feel as if we are at rest. But relative to the pole star we are moving along a circular path. Also relative to the sun we are moving along an elliptical path around the sun. So actually speaking we are not at rest. In the same nothing is stationary. Everything is in motion. Rest means only a relative term.
Relative motion
Yes, motion and rest are relative terms because an object can be considered in motion or at rest depending on the observer's frame of reference. An object at rest in one frame of reference may appear to be in motion in another frame of reference.
Friction opposes the relative motion of surfaces in contact. It acts in the direction opposite to the direction of motion or tendency of motion between two surfaces.
Motion is relative to an observer's frame of Reference.
Motion is relative. That's because you can't define motion because it's relative to the observer's point of view. :D Oh & you have to have a reference frame b/c you can't answer, "are you moving?" It has to be "are you moving compared to ______."
At rest and in motion are relative terms. When we say 'in motion' or 'at rest' we mean relative to something else. If you were travelling in a car for instance, you would be at rest relative to the car but in motion relative to the outside world.
motion is realtive
The pen is at rest as long as it is not moving relative to its surroundings. If the pen is stationary, it is considered to be at rest.
An object is considered to be in motion when its position changes relative to a reference point over time. Movement can be measured in terms of distance traveled in a specific direction.
The object is in motion relative to the reference point.