c Centimeter
g grams
s seconds
Heat is used in three stages 1. To rise the temperature of ice from -7 to 0 deg celsius 2. To change ice into water - melting 3. To rise temperature of water from 0 to 20 deg Celsius Hence Heat = 0.380*S*7 + 0.380*L+0.380*s*20 S - specific heat capacity of ice s- specific heat capacity of wate L= Laten heat of fusion of ice. Please get the data from data book, plug and find the heat needed
The specific heat capacity of silver is 0.235 J/g°C. To raise the temperature of 3 g of silver by 5 °C (from 15 to 20°C), you would need 3 g x 5 °C x 0.235 J/g°C = 3.525 J of energy.
The heat of formation of water is the energy released or absorbed when one mole of water is formed from its elements in their standard states. For water, the heat of formation is -285.8 kJ/mol. This negative value indicates that the reaction is exothermic, meaning it releases energy.
Silver has the highest specific heat capacity among the materials listed (0.235 J/g°C), followed by alcohol (0.58 J/g°C), sand (0.84 J/g°C), and carbon (0.71 J/g°C).
The amount of heat lost can be calculated using the formula: Q = mcΔT, where Q is the heat lost, m is the mass of copper (640 g), c is the specific heat capacity of copper (0.385 J/g°C), and ΔT is the change in temperature (375°C - 26°C = 349°C). Plugging these values into the formula, we get: Q = (640 g)(0.385 J/g°C)(349°C) = 85,328 J. Therefore, 85,328 J of heat is lost when the copper cools from 375°C to 26°C.
g p s c 2011 or g p s c 2012?
G Mohan Reddy
moduldcase circuit breaker
S=Service C=Courtous O=Ovident U=Unity T=Trust
C. G. S. DeVilliers has written: 'Goue fluit, goue fluit'
S
G C. Payne has written: 'Adventures with sculpture, by G. C. Payne' -- subject(s): Technique, Sculpture
A. G. G. C. Pentreath has written: 'Rochester Cathedral' -- subject(s): Rochester Cathedral
C+I+G+S=GDP C=consumption I=investment G=government expenditures S=net export
Joseph cyril bamford
g => (g or h) => (s and t) => t => (t or u) => (c and d) => c.We are given premises:# (g or h) -> (s and t) # (t or u) -> (c and d) We would like to derive g -> c.If we assume g (the antecedent in the conclusion) we have the following derivation: # g (assumption) # g or h(weakening) # s and t (premise 1 (modus ponens)) # t(weakening) # t or u (weakening) # c and d (premise 2 (modus ponens)) # c (weakening)So, assuming g we can derive c, i.e. g -> c
G. C. Lindsay has written: 'Contracts' -- subject(s): Contracts