It is not possible to create a perpetual motion machine because it violates the laws of thermodynamics, which state that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred or converted.
There is no conclusive evidence of a perpetual motion machine being successfully invented. Such a machine would violate the laws of thermodynamics, specifically the conservation of energy. Many attempts to create perpetual motion machines have failed to provide sustained motion without an external energy source.
Theoretically it is impossible. Many have tried and many continue to attempt to develop a perpetual motion machine. Only if there is no friction and no energy is lost to the surroundings, would perpetual motion be possible... No. Such machines are not possible, although until the end of mankind people will perpetually try to imagine or create one.
It is not possible to build a perpetual motion machine using magnets because it goes against the laws of physics. Perpetual motion machines would violate the law of conservation of energy, which states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred or converted.
It is currently not possible to build a perpetual motion machine that can generate unlimited energy without external sources of power. The laws of physics, specifically the law of conservation of energy, dictate that perpetual motion machines are not feasible.
Perpetual motion would only fit the principle of the conservation of energy if it was a machine that moved that did not have any friction or produce any sound or produce any form of heat or energy that could be lost in any way. Since no such machine is possible to create, as far as we know, perpetual motion is declared an impossibility and does NOT fit the principle of the conservation of energy. Energy will undoubtedly be lost somewhere in a moving system.
There is no conclusive evidence of a perpetual motion machine being successfully invented. Such a machine would violate the laws of thermodynamics, specifically the conservation of energy. Many attempts to create perpetual motion machines have failed to provide sustained motion without an external energy source.
Perpetual motion machines are theoretical only. No one has actually invented one. A perpetual motion machine would have to be able to provide its own source of energy to continue operating.
There is no answer to your question because a perpetual motion machine is impossible. If one could be built, its own motion would be considered work.
Theoretically it is impossible. Many have tried and many continue to attempt to develop a perpetual motion machine. Only if there is no friction and no energy is lost to the surroundings, would perpetual motion be possible... No. Such machines are not possible, although until the end of mankind people will perpetually try to imagine or create one.
It is not possible to build a perpetual motion machine using magnets because it goes against the laws of physics. Perpetual motion machines would violate the law of conservation of energy, which states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred or converted.
It is currently not possible to build a perpetual motion machine that can generate unlimited energy without external sources of power. The laws of physics, specifically the law of conservation of energy, dictate that perpetual motion machines are not feasible.
Perpetual motion would only fit the principle of the conservation of energy if it was a machine that moved that did not have any friction or produce any sound or produce any form of heat or energy that could be lost in any way. Since no such machine is possible to create, as far as we know, perpetual motion is declared an impossibility and does NOT fit the principle of the conservation of energy. Energy will undoubtedly be lost somewhere in a moving system.
It's not possible because it would violate one or both of the laws of thermodynamics. The first law of thermodynamics says that you can't create energy from nothing, or to out it another way, you can't get more energy out of a machine than you put into it. The second law says that no machine is 100% efficient. You must actually get less energy out of a machine than you put into it. The laws of thermodynamics apply to the entire universe and all bodies within it, including alleged perpetual motion machines.
No one. Perpetual motion has not been invented yet.
Energy can be converted from one form to another but it can't be created or destroyed. Google "perpetual motion"
Perpetual motion is theoretically impossible. In order to have perpetual motion, you would need over 100 percent efficiency and to overcome drag, gravity and friction. When faced with someone who claims to have one, it is often quite difficult to see where they have erred. The patent office insists on a working prototype for this reason. The inventors usually have great zeal and can be quite intelligent, but when pressed for details, refuse to divulge them. The long colorful history of perpetual motion devices can be found online.
if planetary motion is to be considered perpetual , then the answer is yes. Bcoz usage of gravity determined by the temperature of sun and the planet respectively keeps them in motion . similarly designing a machine running on no additional costs, by using forces of nature can also be termed as perpetuals . rather than considering the laws , many of their designs using nature as their support can be at least encouraged to produce power .They can be put to use to provide the needs of the hour for future development. Moreover in this Universe there is no possibility to create a perpetual machine, as any machine/least known particle can never escape the force of gravity. so y not utilise it to create green energies. if that is the case , i have seen and checked thoroughly a working prototype already which can produce 50Mw at only an one time investment of 2.5 million $ for millions of years to come.why not use them instead of dangerous+costly atomic power plants. fred7sofi@yahoo.com