Shorter pulses have higher bandwidth because their frequency content is spread out over a wider range of frequencies, allowing for more information to be transmitted. This results in better resolution as the shorter pulses can distinguish between signals that are close in time due to their higher frequency content, enabling more precise measurements and data analysis.
No, resolution does not decrease when the wavelength of the illuminating light decreases. In fact, shorter wavelengths of light can improve resolution in microscopy by enabling higher magnification and reducing the diffraction limit.
Blue light has a shorter wavelength than red light, allowing it to resolve smaller details due to the phenomenon of diffraction. Blue light has a higher numerical aperture in optical systems, enabling higher resolution. Additionally, shorter wavelengths are less prone to scattering, resulting in sharper images in optical microscopy.
The resolution of a microscope determines how much detail can be seen in an image. Higher resolution allows for clearer and more defined images, enabling better observation and analysis of the specimen. Moreover, a higher resolution microscope can reveal finer structures that may be crucial for various scientific and medical applications.
Shorter objects have higher pitches because they vibrate more frequently due to their shorter length. The length of an object determines the wavelength of the sound waves it produces, with shorter lengths resulting in shorter wavelengths and higher frequencies, which are perceived as higher pitches.
Frequency in sonar refers to the number of sound waves emitted per second. Higher frequencies provide better resolution and detail in detecting objects, but have shorter range and are absorbed more easily by water. Lower frequencies can travel long distances underwater, but have poorer resolution. The choice of frequency in sonar depends on the specific application and desired trade-offs.
Higher resolution on movies means that the picture will be clearer than on a movie with less resolution. So if you want a really good movie experience, go with the higher resolution.
Normally, higher resolutions are always considered to be better. A higher resolution means higher quality images or video. There are some exceptions where higher resolution can be detrimental. High resolution means more data to store and transmit an image or a video signal. HDTV requires 5 times more data than standard definition signals. That means 5 times the storage space and 5 times the bandwidth for transmission. For storage, it means more disk space in an editor or a PVR. For transmission, it means a bigger part of the total cable or satellite bandwidth. The result is fewer programs stored or fewer channels. In some cases, older television content that was produced as SD is being boradcast in an HD format. The image quality doesn't get any better because the conversion never adds detail that wasn't there to start with. It does use the full HD data rate though. In this case, higher resolution doesn't mean higher quality. Sometimes, higher resolution just means running out of storage space faster or fewer channels. So, although high resolution is usually a good thing, there can be reasons why lower resolution might be better, just once in a while.
its better
X-rays have shorter wavelengths that are better suited to interacting with smaller atomic structures and providing detailed images of tissues and bones. A shorter wavelength allows for higher resolution and clearer images, making them ideal for medical imaging applications.
no,because generally the lower frequency side existed for lower bandwidth,and higher frequency side existed higher bandwidth,so thus we can say that lower bandwidth has generally has lower power as compared to higher bandwidth.
Generally higher resolution is better but three are instances where increased resolution makes no difference. Text based programs tend to use a far lower resolution than is available. Increasing resolution does not increase readability. Also, using a very high resolution monitor to display low resolution graphics will not make the graphics any better resolution. As high resolution graphics demand a lot of processing power, unnecessary resolution can sometimes take processing power away from other more important tasks. So, while there is no need to obtain the lowest resolution systems, beware of spending more money on a high resolution display if you simply don't need it.
Actually its not the altitude of the satellite but the resolution of the camera that is responsible for a high resolution imagery. In fact the better resolution imagery in Google Earth comes from aerial and street-level photography.
Blue lighthas the shortestwavelengthof the visible spectrum. The shorter the wavelength, the higher the resolution one can achieve with alight microscope.The resolution using only blue light is about 4 times better than with using all the wavelengths of visible light.
You're talking about lines of video resolution, or generally, the amount of picture detail. Of course a 1080 (I or P) is going to offer greater detail, but you also need to keep in mind the original picture source and the system used by which it was recorded.
No, resolution does not decrease when the wavelength of the illuminating light decreases. In fact, shorter wavelengths of light can improve resolution in microscopy by enabling higher magnification and reducing the diffraction limit.
They do give you higher bandwidth capabilities for your networking.
Screen Size Size of intended pixels (can it be manufactured reliably?) Desired resolution in pixels/inch. Dimensions of monitor (called aspect ratio) Onboard video driver within monitor. Available components for higher processing bandwidth etc.