An object is in accelerated motion if its velocity changes over time, whether in magnitude, direction, or both. This change in velocity can be due to forces acting on the object, indicating acceleration.
An object is said to have accelerated motion when its velocity is changing over time. This change in velocity could be due to an increase or decrease in speed, or a change in direction. It is not just moving at a constant speed.
Yes, it is correct to say that inertia causes a moving object to continue moving. Inertia is the tendency of an object to resist changes in its motion, so once an object is in motion, it will continue moving unless acted upon by an external force.
The "equations of motion" are statements that describe motion. They would not be of much use if the very thing they're used to describe caused them to change. I'll say they don't.
An object is considered to be in motion when its position changes with respect to a reference point over a period of time. The object's motion can be described in terms of its speed, direction, and acceleration.
An object is in motion if it changes position relative to a reference point. Motion is a relative quantity and is expressed in respect to the position of another object. Example: both a car and the Earth are moving (earth is revolving around the sun) but if we express the motion of the car in respect to the Earth, we say the car is moving relative to the Earth. At the same time the earth is moving relative to the sun.
You would say that the object in motion is accelerating. Or you can say that the object's velocity is increasing.
An object is said to have accelerated motion when its velocity is changing over time. This change in velocity could be due to an increase or decrease in speed, or a change in direction. It is not just moving at a constant speed.
It means that the object is moving.
Yes, it is correct to say that inertia causes a moving object to continue moving. Inertia is the tendency of an object to resist changes in its motion, so once an object is in motion, it will continue moving unless acted upon by an external force.
That is equivalent to saying that: * The object is moving, or * The object doesn't stay all the time in the same place.
The "equations of motion" are statements that describe motion. They would not be of much use if the very thing they're used to describe caused them to change. I'll say they don't.
when can you say that the object is in motion
An object is considered to be in motion when its position changes with respect to a reference point over a period of time. The object's motion can be described in terms of its speed, direction, and acceleration.
You could say that its motion is uniform, meaning that its speed is constant,and that it's moving in a straight line.
An object is in motion if it changes position relative to a reference point. Motion is a relative quantity and is expressed in respect to the position of another object. Example: both a car and the Earth are moving (earth is revolving around the sun) but if we express the motion of the car in respect to the Earth, we say the car is moving relative to the Earth. At the same time the earth is moving relative to the sun.
Some other words for still or unmoving:immobilemotionlessstationary
That the object is moving at a constant velocity