You have to use an accurate measure with fine divisions, and pick out a noticeable spot on the object to compare position over time. Measuring over a longer period of time is useful too, note down the position every minute or even longer intervals if necessary
The term "see" is very vague, but I will assume it means "see with the naked eye over a short period of time".
The easiest way to see long slow movements is historical markers. For example, the Columbia Ice Fields in Alberta, Canada have retreated 1500m over the last 260 years. This is equal to about 15.8mm per day. Over the years, signs have been placed up the mountainside showing the extent at that period.
For short-period slow movements, there are several different options, but one of the preferred methods is a series of force meters that can detect a change in pressure at a given point.
A reference point is a place or object used for comparison to determine if something is in motion.
To determine if an object moves w.r.t. an observer or reference point, measure its distance to the observer, then later measure the distance again and note whether it is the same.
mark its' current position and leave it for a period of time. Then measure and divide for speed.
it would be in the process of moving It depends on your perspective. If you were also moving in the same direction and at the same speed, is the object moving?
There's no such thing as "motion through space". Motion must be measured relative to another object. So we just measure how fast the other object appears to be moving, and there we go.
Any uniformly moving observer in an inertial frame, cannot determine his "absolute" state of motion by a co-moving experimental arrangement...Principal of Relativity.
Photograph it from the same exact spot (ie use a tripod, lock the camera down) at different times like every 10 seconds, or every minute, whatever you feel might be best.
mark its' current position and leave it for a period of time. Then measure and divide for speed.
mark its' current position and leave it for a period of time. Then measure and divide for speed.
mark its' current position and leave it for a period of time. Then measure and divide for speed.
The 1 way you can tell an object is in motion is by having a focus point that does not move and watch and see if the object you are looking for is moving. Another way to notice where the object is now, then later, check and see if the object has been moving. lastly, if you are a scientist, you can use telescopes, computers, and the latest gadgets to tell you if an object is in motion.
it would be in the process of moving It depends on your perspective. If you were also moving in the same direction and at the same speed, is the object moving?
There's no such thing as "motion through space". Motion must be measured relative to another object. So we just measure how fast the other object appears to be moving, and there we go.
The 1 way you can tell an object is in motion is by having a focus point that does not move and watch and see if the object you are looking for is moving. Another way to notice where the object is now, then later, check and see if the object has been moving. lastly, if you are a scientist, you can use telescopes, computers, and the latest gadgets to tell you if an object is in motion.
it may tell the speed of the moving object
Any uniformly moving observer in an inertial frame, cannot determine his "absolute" state of motion by a co-moving experimental arrangement...Principal of Relativity.
Photograph it from the same exact spot (ie use a tripod, lock the camera down) at different times like every 10 seconds, or every minute, whatever you feel might be best.
Velocity tells you what speed a moving object travels at and in what direction.
Look at it now, go away, come back some time later, and see if it's in a different place.