All vector quantities, and many scalar ones too, depend on the frame of reference.
There is no such thing as "real" speed or "real" direction of motion ... only speed
and direction compared to the motion of the person measuring them.
Example:
A person is sitting in a comfortable seat, with a book in his lap. Since the book is not
moving, he's able to read the book, and even drift off and nap for a few minutes.
But the person is actually sitting in Row-14, Seat-B of a transcontinental jet flight.
A person on the ground who watches the aircraft fly over him sees the book move
by at 350 miles per hour ... too fast for him to make out any of the words in it.
Velocity is negative in a moving object when the object is moving in the opposite direction of its positive reference point.
To determine velocity, you need to know the object's speed (how fast it is moving), the direction in which it is moving (velocity is a vector quantity with magnitude and direction), and the reference point or frame of reference from which the velocity is being measured.
When an object is observed from a moving frame of reference, its velocity may appear different due to the relative motion between the observer and the object. This change in velocity is known as relative velocity, and it can be calculated by considering the velocities of both the object and the observer.
No, the trajectory of a moving point does not depend on the chosen reference frame. The trajectory is a physical path that the point follows through space, and it remains the same regardless of the reference frame used to analyze it.
The velocity of a toothpick would depend on how fast it is moving. If it is stationary, its velocity would be 0 m/s. If it is moving, its velocity would be the rate of change of its position over time, measured in meters per second.
Velocity is negative in a moving object when the object is moving in the opposite direction of its positive reference point.
To determine velocity, you need to know the object's speed (how fast it is moving), the direction in which it is moving (velocity is a vector quantity with magnitude and direction), and the reference point or frame of reference from which the velocity is being measured.
The distance doesn't depend on the mass.
When an object is observed from a moving frame of reference, its velocity may appear different due to the relative motion between the observer and the object. This change in velocity is known as relative velocity, and it can be calculated by considering the velocities of both the object and the observer.
No, the trajectory of a moving point does not depend on the chosen reference frame. The trajectory is a physical path that the point follows through space, and it remains the same regardless of the reference frame used to analyze it.
The velocity of a toothpick would depend on how fast it is moving. If it is stationary, its velocity would be 0 m/s. If it is moving, its velocity would be the rate of change of its position over time, measured in meters per second.
Both momentum and kinetic energy depend on mass and velocity.
What pushes us back is a change in velocity (i.e., an acceleration), not the velocity itself. You might as well say that the train is stationary, and that planet Earth is moving under the train. In outer space, there is no fixed reference point; and it doesn't make sense to speak of the "real" velocity. A velocity must always be indicated with relationship to some reference point. Using the Earth as a reference point is convenient, but it isn't the only option.What pushes us back is a change in velocity (i.e., an acceleration), not the velocity itself. You might as well say that the train is stationary, and that planet Earth is moving under the train. In outer space, there is no fixed reference point; and it doesn't make sense to speak of the "real" velocity. A velocity must always be indicated with relationship to some reference point. Using the Earth as a reference point is convenient, but it isn't the only option.What pushes us back is a change in velocity (i.e., an acceleration), not the velocity itself. You might as well say that the train is stationary, and that planet Earth is moving under the train. In outer space, there is no fixed reference point; and it doesn't make sense to speak of the "real" velocity. A velocity must always be indicated with relationship to some reference point. Using the Earth as a reference point is convenient, but it isn't the only option.What pushes us back is a change in velocity (i.e., an acceleration), not the velocity itself. You might as well say that the train is stationary, and that planet Earth is moving under the train. In outer space, there is no fixed reference point; and it doesn't make sense to speak of the "real" velocity. A velocity must always be indicated with relationship to some reference point. Using the Earth as a reference point is convenient, but it isn't the only option.
When an object is moving, it demonstrates a change in its position with respect to a reference point over time. This change in position can be observed through its displacement, velocity, and acceleration relative to the reference point.
Yes it is.
The velocity of a car traveling backwards would be negative, as it is moving in the opposite direction of its positive reference point.
The direction of velocity can be determined by looking at the motion of an object in relation to a reference point. Velocity is a vector quantity that includes both speed and direction. The direction of velocity is indicated by the direction in which an object is moving, whether it is moving forward, backward, left, right, up, or down.