How does the modern controversy over creationism and evolution reflect two ways of knowing about the physical world?

Answer 1

It doesn't. Where did you get this question? It is loaded and leading.

There is no modern controversy over evolutionary theory in science, only in the minds of creationist who bring their nonsense, devoid of all science, into the public square. There are not two ways of knowing the physical world ( " two ways of knowing " sounds right out of the post modern playbook ) but only the one way of empirical investigation. The scientific method.

Evolution is a fact and the theory of evolution by natural selection explains much about this fact. There is no equal weight of opinion here. One side, the scientific side, has the evidence. The other side, the creationist side, has nothing but ideology and political attempts to get their " viewpoint " into the public schools and the public discourse.

Answer 2

This controversy reflects the imagined (creationist) and factual (evolutionary) ways of knowing about the physical world.

• Creationism tells us how its adherents want to world to be, particularly about what they want the story of its creation to be. It is generally based on ancient religious beliefs.
• Evolution is what scientists find actually happened to life on earth, and forms part of the larger scientific picture of the natural world. This explanation does not attempt to answer questions on religion.

For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation

Answer 3

To the religious way of thinking, the controversy reflects two views: the traditional view, and a modern, materialistic view. Though evolution can be overlaid upon a religious belief, that is often not the case. The traditional view is one of belief in God. This was once held not only by religious people per se, but also by numerous scientists, including many early evolutionists:

Theistic Evolution's historical development

Even Darwin himself wrote that life was first set in motion by God (On the Origin of Species, 2nd ed., page 428). Thus, there was no underlying reason why the general acceptance of Evolution should have gone parallel with the widespread Atheism which is manifest today. Rather, it is materialism that fueled the later interpretation of Evolution and saw it as proving or enabling disbelief in God.

Many do not realize that there is a scientific basis for belief in Creation, while Evolution can neither be proven nor demonstrated in the lab (in its broader sense of giving rise to new organs or species):

See also:

Is there evidence for Creation?

Can you show that God exists?

Seeing God's wisdom

Answer 4

The controversy over creationism and evolution reflects two ways of knowing about the physical world: science relies on evidence, experimentation, and peer review to form conclusions, while creationism is based on religious beliefs and interpretations of sacred texts. The conflict arises because they are fundamentally different approaches to understanding the origins of life on Earth, with science emphasizing empirical data and creationism focusing on faith-based explanations.