The heat of a nuclear weapon is determined by the rate of decay of fissile material in the core.
For example the smallest amount of Plutonium capable of being used with a neutron reflector at natural critical mass is about 4 kilograms of 93% 239Pu.
Unfortunately a small portion of the remaining 7% will be Plutonium 240 which decays at a faster rate and thus generates heat from it's decay.
In a 4 kilogram mass of Weapons Grade (93% 239Pu) Plutonium, every 937,440 seconds it will generate 0.769 MeV. That's a reasonable amount of energy like having it wrapped by a warm electric blanket.
Over time, this degrades the Plutonium and eventually renders it useless for a nuclear weapon. Every now and then approximately every 15 years the Plutonium in a warhead needs changing.
Heat also makes a nuclear warhead less potent and reduces the yield.
No. LLNL even tested several Uranium-Hydride bombs in the 1950s. Even though their computer models said the devices should explode, none gave a nuclear yield. One could use the waste from the reactor as a Radiological Weapon, but the reactor itself is not useful as a weapon.
The biggest nuclear weapon ever tested was the Tsar Bomba, a hydrogen bomb detonated by the Soviet Union in 1961. It had a yield of 50 megatons, making it the most powerful nuclear weapon ever detonated.
A nuclear weapon is one of the most powerful weapons in existence, so it is difficult to say if there is a specific weapon that is definitively stronger. However, some may argue that certain future technologies, such as antimatter weapons or advanced cyber warfare capabilities, could potentially surpass the destructive power of a nuclear weapon.
The amount of radiation produced by a nuclear weapon can vary depending on its size and yield. However, a single detonation of a nuclear weapon can produce tens of thousands to millions of rads within the immediate vicinity of ground zero. This level of radiation exposure can be lethal to humans and cause widespread health effects.
No, a single nuclear weapon is not powerful enough to blow up an entire continent. The destructive power of a nuclear weapon is concentrated in a relatively small area known as the blast radius. The impact would be devastating locally, but the effect would not extend to an entire continent.
The meaning of the word nuclear weapon, is a weapon that has a nuclear warhead on it.
This nuclear weapon is called an atomic bomb or a nuclear bomb
Nuclear weapon detonations
If by "bomb" you mean a conventional explosive weapon, then the nuclear weapon is more powerful.
Theoretically any Thermonuclear Fusion Explosions (what happens on the surface of the sun) are the same heat.
nuclear chemicals such as plutonium
NO
no
No. LLNL even tested several Uranium-Hydride bombs in the 1950s. Even though their computer models said the devices should explode, none gave a nuclear yield. One could use the waste from the reactor as a Radiological Weapon, but the reactor itself is not useful as a weapon.
the first nuclear weapon was issued in WW2 created by the americans in a chicargo squash court
plutonium + weapon
yes