0
What else can I help you with?
If carbon were used as nuclear fuel it would be best?
Carbon is not commonly used as nuclear fuel because it does not readily undergo nuclear fission reactions. Elements such as uranium and plutonium are more suitable for use as nuclear fuels due to their ability to sustain nuclear chain reactions.
How long has the nuclear fuel of the sun been burning?
The Sun is estimated, based on its size and energy production, to be about 5 billion years old."The Solar System", Roman Smoluchowski, Scientific American Library, 1983, page 6
When is nuclear energy going to run out?
Estimates on uranium resources vary from a few decades to a hundred years or more. The use of the material can be extended by recycling and processing, or by using newer technology. Thorium has not been used for nuclear power, but could be. There is enough thorium to power the world, at current levels of demand, for several thousand years at least. There are also thorium power technologies that give promise of producing very little waste, and possibly even of consuming the old nuclear waste and rendering it inert.
What was not a potential problem of using more nuclear energy?
The plant could melt down.
What happens after a freely moving neutron it is introduced to a nuclear fuel?
When a freely moving neutron is introduced to a nuclear fuel like uranium, it can be absorbed by the nucleus of the fuel atom, causing it to become unstable and split into two or more smaller atoms, releasing energy and more neutrons in the process. This is known as nuclear fission, and it can lead to a chain reaction if the released neutrons go on to collide with other fuel atoms and cause them to undergo fission as well.
What is the main difference between breeder nuclear fission and convention nuclear fission?
Breeder nuclear fission produces more fissile material than it consumes, while conventional nuclear fission produces energy without producing additional fuel. Breeder reactors can create more fuel (like plutonium) for use in other reactors, making them potentially more efficient in terms of fuel usage.
Why does the sun go on shining?
The Sun gets its energy from nuclear reactions; it has enough fuel to continue shining for a few billion years more.
How more many years will the sun runs out of fuel and burns out?
Billions
Is thorium a more abundant nuclear fuel than uranium?
Today thorium is used as nuclear fuel only in India; very probable the future will be different.
If carbon were used as nuclear fuel it would be best?
Carbon is not commonly used as nuclear fuel because it does not readily undergo nuclear fission reactions. Elements such as uranium and plutonium are more suitable for use as nuclear fuels due to their ability to sustain nuclear chain reactions.
How long has the nuclear fuel of the sun been burning?
The Sun is estimated, based on its size and energy production, to be about 5 billion years old."The Solar System", Roman Smoluchowski, Scientific American Library, 1983, page 6
Which is more expensive fuel or uranium?
Uranium is more expensive, but the kWh in a nuclear power plant is more cheaper.
What is the renewable energy source of nuclear?
Nuclear energy is not renewable. There is a fixed amount of potential fuel on the earth. Once it is used, there will be no more.
Why use plutonium in nuclear reactors?
Plutonium is used in nuclear reactors as a fuel because it can undergo fission, producing energy in the process. It is created as a byproduct in uranium-fueled reactors and can be recycled for use as fuel in mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel. Plutonium helps extend the fuel cycle and reduce waste by utilizing more of the energy content in nuclear fuel.
When is nuclear energy going to run out?
Estimates on uranium resources vary from a few decades to a hundred years or more. The use of the material can be extended by recycling and processing, or by using newer technology. Thorium has not been used for nuclear power, but could be. There is enough thorium to power the world, at current levels of demand, for several thousand years at least. There are also thorium power technologies that give promise of producing very little waste, and possibly even of consuming the old nuclear waste and rendering it inert.
Which is more of a threat transporting nuclear fuel waste or transporting toxic chemicals?
Transporting nuclear fuel waste is considered more of a threat due to the potential for a radioactive release in the event of a transport accident. However, both nuclear fuel waste and toxic chemicals pose significant risks to human health and the environment if not transported safely and securely. It is essential to have stringent safety protocols and regulations in place for both types of hazardous materials.
What was not a potential problem of using more nuclear energy?
The plant could melt down.
