Antimatter is the most expensive substance in the world with a price of $2.5million per gram.
It costs up to $62.5 TRILLION as anti hydrogen
First of all. There is no doubt about the reality of anti matter. Anti matter is a fact. 2 examples where we have spotted anti matter, or anti particles. In CERN's LHC (large hadron collider) the scientist spotted a antiparticle after the collision of the particles. We have reached the conclusion: When matter is created there is also created anti matter. The problem is that when this particle, anti particle pair is created, the particles instantly annihilates each other turning them selves into energy in the form of light. A second example is when lightning strikes. Through the observation of gamma radiation emmitted when lightning strikes we have reached the conclusion that a anti particle has to be created. Today we even use anti particles to detect cancer and even remove tumors from the human body. I don't have enough knowledge to give you have detailed explaination on how they do this. But if you do a little research on the internet im sure you will find more information on the subject. Edit: And no, anti matter will not "only" excist within matter. Because when matter meets anti matter it annihilates into pure energy, meaning that matter and anti matter can't excist together in that way. ~Stenpung~
Anti- Matter
They are mirror images of the other: protons have a certain weight and are positively charged, anti-protons have the same weight but are negatively charged. Antimatter is just matter with an opposite charge.
We don't know the EXACT fraction of the observable Universe that is anti-matter, as opposed to the matter that constitutes our galaxy. We do know, however, that this fraction is quite small. If there WERE large sections of our Universe that consisted of anti-matter, the bounday layer between that section and the matter sections would have collisions between matter and anti-matter, and this would result in gamma rays coming from those collisions. Yes, it would be very few collisions and very rare gamma rays -- the density of inter-galactic space is a mere one atom per cubic meter-- but the gammas should be detectable. In thirty years of looking for them, we haven't found them. From this are pretty much forced to conclude that the entire observable Universe consists of the same matter stuff of our Local Cluster.
That depends on where you start and how much mass you want to take there. There are two many variables to make a guess. In general, because matter-antimatter conversion to energy results in a huge amount of energy (assuming that the antimatter is used in a matter-antimatter drive of some sort), it wouldn't take much.
Probably the same as a fistful of normal matter. Note that just like normal matter comes in different varieties, so could antimatter, in principle - that is, you could have anti-hydrogen, anti-water, anti-lead, etc. So, I would expect a fistful of anti-lead to weigh as much as a fistful of normal lead, a fistful of anti-lithium to weigh as much as a fistful of normal lithium, etc.
One of the unsolved questions about our Universe is why it is composed almost entirely of matter. In our understanding of our Universe, the ratio of matter to anti-matter should be about 50-50. Saying, "All the anti-matter went into the super-massive black holes (smbh) at the center of galaxies" doesn't solve very much. It just leads to the question, "Why did only anti-matter go into smbh, and not matter?" There is SOMETHING about our Universe that favors matter over anti-matter. We just don't yet know what that something is. Simply saying that it is something that makes anti-matter, but not matter, go into smbh doesn't really solve much.
A vacuum consist of anti-matter; the opposite of matter...matter is something and anti-matter is nothing. When something is added to the vacuum the anti-matter is displaced and only matter will now remains. If you were made out of anti-matter then your observable results would be the opposite. Matter and anti-matter cannot exist in the same space; only one of the two can exist in any place at any one time. When you remove matter from a space the only thing that can exisist in that space is anti-matter!
As soon as anti-matter comes in contact with matter, the two annihilate. As such, placing anti-matter into any container made of matter would result in both being annihilated. The only way to maintain anti-matter for any length of time is to keep it isolated from matter. Magnetic fields can do this for a short time, but invevitably the anti-matter and the matter meet each other.
An antonym for matter is anti-matter.
Yes. not only elements all particle in the universe are matter. From Sambit Pal India. *********************** Anti particles are not matter they are anti-matter.
Matter is anything except anti-matter, and matter occupies all of everything everywhere. Basically, yes. Unless you see anti-matter, which is doubtful because the anti-matter would implode upon contact with matter, which includes air.
Anti-matter
No.
An anti-matter proton (or simply an "anti-proton") differs in charge, and thus spin as well.
When Matter and anti-matter collided the Big Bang came into existence. But something still remains a mystery that how did the Matter and anti-matter come.
the question makes no sense, anti matter is produced when energy is converted into matter. no matter what, when energy converts into matter both matter and anti matter is created, and they can unite once more to be converted back into energy, basicly, ther is the same amount of anti matter particles as there are normal matter particles, but that's a diffrent story