I sincerely believe there must be a "Re-Examination on the Inverse Square Laws and its Relationship to the Guassian Laws on the Electrostatic Equilibrium on Surfaces." (see rolandechobirds.com) Paper pub. Prudue University 2007 at the ESA Meeting. It is becoming clear when we confirmed on July 18, 1996 (NYTms) that inside the Earth the magntic ball was solid and that the possiblities of the Electrostatic, Magnetic and Gravity now may be all unified as on field. Roland
That can be gravity, electrostatic force, magnetic force, or strong nuclear force. As you've described it in the question, the only thing you can call it for sure is "mutual force of attraction".
That can be gravity, electrostatic force, magnetic force, or strong nuclear force. As it's described in the question, the only thing we know for sure is that it's a "mutual force of attraction".
Gravity is considered a weak force compared to other fundamental forces like electromagnetism or the strong nuclear force. However, gravity is unique in that it has an infinite range and always acts to attract objects with mass. Despite being considered weak on the scale of particles, gravity dominates on larger scales such as planetary and galactic bodies.
Electrostatic force IS stronger than gravitational force because the electrostatic force between a charged straw (which has been rubbed with a cloth) can defy gravity and stick to the ceiling.
Electromagnetism is strong compared to gravity because it involves the interaction of charged particles, which can create strong electric and magnetic fields. These fields can exert forces over long distances and result in stronger interactions than gravity. Additionally, electromagnetism is mediated by photons, which are massless particles, allowing for the exchange of forces at the speed of light.
Surface gravity on mars is 0.376 compared to that of the earth.
No. Compared with the other basic forces, gravity is remarkably weak.
-- gravity -- electrostatic force -- weak nuclear force -- strong nuclear force
Compared to the moon, it's pretty strong. Compared to Jupiter, it's pretty weak.
16.55% as strong on the surface.
Lunar gravity is one-sixth as strong as Earth's gravity.
The question neglects to mention what other place it wants compared to Earth, so no comparison is possible.
No, attractions among ions within a crystal lattice are strong due to the electrostatic forces between oppositely charged ions. These attractions create a stable structure that gives crystals their rigidity and specific properties.
That can be gravity, electrostatic force, magnetic force, or strong nuclear force. As you've described it in the question, the only thing you can call it for sure is "mutual force of attraction".
The formation of ionic compounds is typically exothermic, meaning it releases energy in the form of heat. This is because the strong electrostatic attractions between positively and negatively charged ions result in a more stable state compared to the individual atoms.
CoHPO4 forms ionic bonds. It consists of a cation (Co2+) and multiple anions (HPO4) that are held together by strong electrostatic attractions.
Because of Earth's size, and considering it as one of the smallest planets, it has a weak gravity compared to the OTHER planets. Most planets have greater gravity because of their size. Earth has a stronger gravity compared to mars, mercury, and venus.