It is a damped harmonic motion.
My friend would say that as he passes me, he sees me moving in the opposite direction relative to him. He would also observe a change in the distance between us as he moves ahead of me.
If you splash a stone in the lake, where would it go? It would start from the middle, and separate outwards evenly.
A rigid motion transformation is one that preserves distances and angles between points in a geometric shape. Anything that involves changing the size or shape of the object, such as scaling or shearing, would not describe a rigid motion transformation.
the point of view that you describe motion from is whatever you choose it to be. generally we describe motion relative to earth. for example you could say that a car is moving 60mph north, and it would be assumed to be moving relative to earth; but if someone is riding their bike 10mph north, then the car is moving 50mph north relative to the bike. you see, you could describe the car moving compared to a star in a distant galaxy if you wanted, but that would be useless information so you should choose something relative to the problem.
The water particles move in a circular motion. They swing forward and then back. The water itself does not really move to the shore. If that happened, the beach you would be on would be overflowing with water. The water particles just do a little jolt along with the wave. Then, they return to their original position.
My friend would say that as he passes me, he sees me moving in the opposite direction relative to him. He would also observe a change in the distance between us as he moves ahead of me.
If you splash a stone in the lake, where would it go? It would start from the middle, and separate outwards evenly.
Inertia
wet and tasteless.
Johann Kepler.
The speed of light slows in water.
It is the other way around. Water passes from the one w/ more water to the one with less.
A rigid motion transformation is one that preserves distances and angles between points in a geometric shape. Anything that involves changing the size or shape of the object, such as scaling or shearing, would not describe a rigid motion transformation.
Regarding the composition of ocean water, I would describe it as a homogeneous mixture, or solution.
That would be the 'Colon" (KOE-lunn)
the point of view that you describe motion from is whatever you choose it to be. generally we describe motion relative to earth. for example you could say that a car is moving 60mph north, and it would be assumed to be moving relative to earth; but if someone is riding their bike 10mph north, then the car is moving 50mph north relative to the bike. you see, you could describe the car moving compared to a star in a distant galaxy if you wanted, but that would be useless information so you should choose something relative to the problem.
There's gravity, momentum, centripetal force, and friction involved.