0
According to Law of Inertia, an object will remain in its state of motion, either at rest or moving until an external unbalanced force acts on it. So if the object is at rest, some external force (F) has to be applied in order to move that object. Law of Inertia is actually a second law, out of three Newton's laws of motion.
What else can I help you with?
Can an object be moving but still have a net force of zero?
Yes, an object can be moving at a constant velocity (i.e., moving with no acceleration) and have a net force of zero. This occurs when the forces acting on the object are balanced, such as when an object is in equilibrium.
Can an object be moveing and still be in equilibrium?
No, an object cannot be in equilibrium if it is moving. Equilibrium is a state where the net forces acting on an object are balanced and there is no acceleration. If an object is moving, there must be an unbalanced force acting on it causing its motion.
If balanced forces are acting on an object it will seem as if a net force is acting on the object?
If balanced forces are acting on an object, the object will remain at rest or continue moving at a constant velocity. Even though there is no acceleration, it might still appear as if a net force is acting on the object due to external factors such as friction or air resistance.
How do you have zero net force but still have motion?
An object can have zero net force but still be in motion if it is moving at a constant velocity. In this case, the forces acting on the object are balanced, resulting in no acceleration. For example, an object traveling at a constant speed on a frictionless surface would have zero net force acting on it.
Can and object be moving and still be in equilibrium?
yes
Can an object be moving but still have a net force of zero?
Yes, an object can be moving at a constant velocity (i.e., moving with no acceleration) and have a net force of zero. This occurs when the forces acting on the object are balanced, such as when an object is in equilibrium.
What is no net force between object and its surroundings?
If there is no net force acting on an object then the movement of the object doesn't change. If it is sitting still, then it remains sitting still. If it is moving, then it continues moving at the same speed in the same direction.
Can an object be moveing and still be in equilibrium?
No, an object cannot be in equilibrium if it is moving. Equilibrium is a state where the net forces acting on an object are balanced and there is no acceleration. If an object is moving, there must be an unbalanced force acting on it causing its motion.
If balanced forces are acting on an object it will seem as if a net force is acting on the object?
If balanced forces are acting on an object, the object will remain at rest or continue moving at a constant velocity. Even though there is no acceleration, it might still appear as if a net force is acting on the object due to external factors such as friction or air resistance.
How do you have zero net force but still have motion?
An object can have zero net force but still be in motion if it is moving at a constant velocity. In this case, the forces acting on the object are balanced, resulting in no acceleration. For example, an object traveling at a constant speed on a frictionless surface would have zero net force acting on it.
Is the net force zero if the object is not moving?
Yes, but an object with net force of zero may still be moving. The net force is zero if the object is not accelerating.
Can and object be moving and still be in equilibrium?
yes
Can an object that has balanced forces acting on it be standing still?
If there are any forces acting on a stationary object, then they must be balanced, or it would no longer remain stationary.It is also possible that the object is already moving. In the forces are balanced on a moving object, the object would continue moving at the same speed and direction (velocity) that it already had.
If the net force acting on an object is 0 can you conclude that the object is at rest Why or why not?
Brief form of discussion: Definitely!Verbose form:Net force is required to change speed or direction of an object's motion.No net force is required to keep it moving in a straight line at a constantspeed.
Is it possible for an object not to be in motion and still have a force acting on it?
Yes, the object can have equal forces acting in opposite directions: 5N ->[]<- 5N The object will have forces acting upon it, but will not move.
When forces acting on a moving object are what the object will travel at a constant speed?
You're fishing for "balanced", but that still doesn't make the statement true.An object on a curved path can have constant speed even though the forceson it are not balanced.
Can there be force without movement?
Yes, force can exist without movement. An example of this is when an object is held stationary against a wall with a force acting on it. The object is not moving, but there is still a force exerted to keep it in place.
