An advantage of using more nuclear energy is that it produces lower greenhouse gas emissions compared to fossil fuels.
Nuclear accidents resulting in radiation leaks can be a potential problem of using more nuclear energy.
A non-example of a potential problem with using nuclear energy could be the positive impact on reducing greenhouse gas emissions compared to fossil fuels. Nuclear energy does not emit carbon dioxide during power generation, making it a cleaner energy source in terms of climate change mitigation.
One potential negative aspect of using more nuclear energy is the risk of accidents and the potential for radioactive contamination.
The plants are very expensive to build, and could be dangerous in case of an accident.
There are arguments about where to store waste.
Nuclear accidents resulting in radiation leaks can be a potential problem of using more nuclear energy.
A non-example of a potential problem with using nuclear energy could be the positive impact on reducing greenhouse gas emissions compared to fossil fuels. Nuclear energy does not emit carbon dioxide during power generation, making it a cleaner energy source in terms of climate change mitigation.
One potential negative aspect of using more nuclear energy is the risk of accidents and the potential for radioactive contamination.
They can provide a lot of energy for people to use - Apex
Nuclear? Possibly.
There are arguments about where to store the waste. (APEX)
The plants are very expensive to build, and could be dangerous in case of an accident.
There are arguments about where to store waste.
Yes, it's true.
The USA started using nuclear energy in 1951
The plant could melt down.
more often than not, potential energy is calculated, not measured, based on which means of energy conversion you are looking for. Potential energy released by falling is not the same as potential energy of a nuclear reaction, although the same object can do both