Yes. There is no system of measurement that is "perfect" in every way. We work hard to reduce error or uncertainty when we measure stuff, but we cannot eliminate it.
calibration
The importance of least count ( the highest degree of accuracy of measurement) helps calculate the margin of errors when doing measurements.
it is difficult to use the measurement in the past than in the measurement in present....
We all know that physics is a subject that includes computation. Without measurement we dont know distances, height, weight,length,and etc. We always used measurements, when we wake up we already using measurements because of the alarm clock that uses time.
A Newton is the measurement unit for force.
This refers to the concept of "panopticism" introduced by philosopher Michel Foucault. It involves creating a social environment where individuals believe they are under constant surveillance and as a result, regulate their behavior to align with societal norms. This process aims to control and shape human behavior through the perception of being watched at all times.
sources of errors encountered in measurment
Some of the reasons are: Systematic measurement errors. Random measurement errors. Poor use of equipment. Recording errors. Calculation errors. Poor plotting. Wrong model.
No, because there can be measurement errors as well as errors in recording the data.
length
every measurement, but Planck scale is a common one
167cm
Purity of substance/material, measurement errors, calculation errors.
J. Bettesworth has written: 'The New universal ready reckoner, or Every trader's infallible guide' -- subject(s): Tables, Money, Measurement
Always repeat the measurement for reliability . Measurement should always be seen up front and not sideways. Use a new scale for better readings.
A number and a unit.
Sagutan mo to ah. sasampalin kita