"Expensive" is relative, since we have been unable to sustain a controlled break-even fusion reaction yet. So far, we have spent 10 billion euros attempting to do so, with another 100 billion budgeted in the next 50 years. If the theoretical concepts hold true, however, fusion power could well be the cheapest power on the planet.
I dont know if fusion can be better than fusion but it is definitly better than oil when used properlu. Fusion is clean energy that has a greater output than oil and is less expensive over time. Oil is pollution the environment is should not be used any longer.
Yes, fusion absorbs energy during the process.
Fusion releases more energy than fission.
The sun's energy is generated through fusion processes.
The sun's energy is generated through fusion processes.
I dont know if fusion can be better than fusion but it is definitly better than oil when used properlu. Fusion is clean energy that has a greater output than oil and is less expensive over time. Oil is pollution the environment is should not be used any longer.
hydrogen fusion
Nuclear fusion produces nuclear energy
The Sun energy is from hydrogen fusion.
Fusion Energy Foundation was created in 1974.
Fusion Energy Foundation ended in 1986.
Because it is a fission process, not fusion
Definition: energy from nuclear fission or fusion: the energy released by nuclear fission or fusion
No, nuclear fusion in the sun is not wind energy. Wind energy is generated from the kinetic energy of moving air masses, while nuclear fusion in the sun is the process by which the sun produces energy through the fusion of hydrogen atoms into helium.
Because it is a fission process, not fusion
Yes, fusion absorbs energy during the process.
The process generating solar energy is one of nuclear fusion.