It is better if the object is lighter on a catapult because it will be easier to launch with more speed and distance. A heavier object may not travel as far or have the same velocity upon launch.
A lighter object will generally go farther in a catapult because it can be launched with more speed due to its lower mass. The lighter object requires less force to accelerate and it experiences less air resistance during flight, allowing it to travel farther.
A heavier ball typically travels further when using a catapult because it can store more potential energy and release it more efficiently upon launch. Light balls may be more affected by air resistance and have less momentum, resulting in a shorter distance traveled.
The heavy object will accelerate less than the light object if equal forces are applied. This is because the heavier object has more mass, so it requires more force to accelerate it.
Inertia is "rotary momentum"; an object's ability to continue spinning when a decelerating force is applied.Just as a heavy object takes more effort to stop from the same speed as a light object, so does a heavy object take more effort to stop from turning at the same speed as a light object.So assuming they are turning at the same angular velocity, the heavier one has a larger inertia. Otherwise, remember that inertia is also proportional to angular velocity.
No, the acceleration of an object depends on both the force applied and the object's mass. A heavier object will require a larger force to accelerate as rapidly as a lighter object with a smaller force. This is described by Newton's second law, which states that acceleration is directly proportional to the force applied and inversely proportional to the object's mass.
A lighter object will generally go farther in a catapult because it can be launched with more speed due to its lower mass. The lighter object requires less force to accelerate and it experiences less air resistance during flight, allowing it to travel farther.
A heavier ball typically travels further when using a catapult because it can store more potential energy and release it more efficiently upon launch. Light balls may be more affected by air resistance and have less momentum, resulting in a shorter distance traveled.
The heavy object will accelerate less than the light object if equal forces are applied. This is because the heavier object has more mass, so it requires more force to accelerate it.
Inertia is "rotary momentum"; an object's ability to continue spinning when a decelerating force is applied.Just as a heavy object takes more effort to stop from the same speed as a light object, so does a heavy object take more effort to stop from turning at the same speed as a light object.So assuming they are turning at the same angular velocity, the heavier one has a larger inertia. Otherwise, remember that inertia is also proportional to angular velocity.
No, the acceleration of an object depends on both the force applied and the object's mass. A heavier object will require a larger force to accelerate as rapidly as a lighter object with a smaller force. This is described by Newton's second law, which states that acceleration is directly proportional to the force applied and inversely proportional to the object's mass.
You need a lens, an object to view, and a light source to magnify an object. The lens will help in focusing the light and enlarging the object, while the light source will help illuminate the object for better visibility.
No one answer to your question. I shoot light .243 bullets for groundhogs, heavier bullets for deer. All other things being equal, the lighter bullet can be driven faster, but the heavier bullet will retain energy at long range better.
The one with the largest mass
Here's the answer, and I love it. Let's assume that heavy objects fall fasterand light objects fall slower, just like everybody wants them to.Follow me now . . .-- Heavier objects fall faster. Lighter objects fall slower.-- Take a heavy object and a light object up to the roof of a tall building.Then take a piece of sticky tape, and stick the light object onto the backof the heavy one. Then walk carefully to the edge of the roof, and dropthe package over the side. As you do that, yell down "Look out below!"-- The heavier object normally falls faster, so it tries to pull the package ahead.The lighter object normally falls slower, so it tries to hold the package back. Soas they fight each other, the package falls at some middle speed, slower thanthe heavy object alone, and faster than the lighter object alone.-- But wait! They're taped together. How is that different from being glued together ?Or melted together ? Or welded together ? Or even inside the same skin ?-- Or even being the same single object ? They could just as well be a single object,one that weighs a little more than the original heavier object.-- But we just agreed that the package falls a little slower than the original heavier object,even though it's heavier than the original heavier object.-- Our orignal assumption . . . that a heavy object falls faster than a lght object . . . leads usdown the garden path to a ridiculous result.That assumption must be wrong.Don't ya just love it !
a lighter one because it doesn't take long for it to get going but, if you wanna know which one will go farther it would be the heavier one because it has more momentum.
When you include the effects of friction, it takes less force to move a light-weight object. If you can get the objects into a frictionless environment, then any force, no matter how small, can move any object, no matter how heavy.
Heavy, light wood is likely to break or snap under tension.