0
What else can I help you with?
What is an energy source that exist in a fixed amount or that is used up faster that it can be replaced in nature?
Fossil fuels, such as coal, oil, and natural gas, are examples of energy sources that exist in a fixed amount and are used up faster than they can be replaced in nature. These sources are non-renewable and finite, meaning they take millions of years to form and cannot be easily replenished.
Energy resources that can't be replaced soon?
Fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas are non-renewable resources that cannot be replaced on a human timescale. These resources take millions of years to form and are being depleted much faster than they can be replaced, leading to concerns about future energy availability and environmental impacts.
Is a nonrenewable energy source?
yeah. it does technically renew, but it take millions of years.
What source of energy cannot be replaced?
Non-renewable sources of energy such as fossil fuels like coal, oil, and natural gas cannot be replaced once they are depleted. These sources take millions of years to form and are being consumed much faster than they can be replenished.
What type of energy does a runner gain when they get faster?
A runner gains kinetic energy as they get faster. This is the energy associated with their motion and speed.
Is nuclear power ethical to use faster than be replaced?
yes because we need our energy and we need to keep our air clean
Is it ethical to hydropower faster than it can be replaced?
yes
Is it ethical to use geothermal energy faster than it can be replaced?
No, it is not ethical to use geothermal energy faster than it can be naturally replenished. This can lead to resource depletion and environmental harm in the long run. It is important to use geothermal energy sustainably to ensure its availability for future generations.
Is it ethical to use geothermal faster than it can be replaced?
No because it is in the ground
Is it ethical to use solar energy faster than it can be replaced?
Natural gas is a not a renewable resource. whatever portion of it is used, can never be replaced, although there are other sources of methane and some them are renewable. Since it cannot be replaced, any use is a use faster than it can be replaced. Thus the question does not compute.
Is it ethical to use hydropower faster than it can be replaced?
It would be, yes, because we need wind for many things, but there is no ethical problem, as it is physically impossible to do this. It can be unethical to use anything faster than it can be replaced, depending on what it is. To do this with trees is unethical, but with coal it is not.
Is it ethical to use coal faster than it can be replaced?
No because it takes longer for coal to produce than it is to use it
Is it ethnical to use nuclear power faster than it can be replaced?
No, because what if all of the money is and we cannot get anymore.
How are renewable and nonrenewable energy alike?
Renewable energy sources use various non petroleum, non wood, non peat, non nuclear sources for fuel energy, typically to produce electricity. Petroleum, wood, peat, and nuclear energy are non renewable sources because they can be depleted faster than they can be replaced. The main way these energy sources are alike is they are all used to produce electricity.
What word means used faster than they're replaced?
energy resources
Is it ethical to use resource faster than it can be?
no it is not because it is not
Which bomb has a faster energy nuclear bomb or atomic bomb?
I am not sure what is meant by the phrase faster energy. As far as the difference. A nuclear bomb can refer to a fission device (also known as atomic bomb). Or it can be a thermonuclear device (combining both fission and fusion reactions), which yields a larger blast energy from the same amount of material.For some reason, links are not allowed to be added right now, so go to Wikipedia and type in "Nuclear Weapon" for more information.
