Absolutely, just think about what happens when you throw a water balloon at someone. the force of the balloon landing on top of their head both changes the motion of the water balloon and it's shape! The same is true if the water balloon had harmlessly bounced off of your adversary's head.
Yes, it is possible for an object to have several forces acting on it and still not change its motion if the forces are balanced or cancel each other out. When the net force on an object is zero (resultant force is zero), the object will remain in its state of motion (either at rest or moving at a constant velocity) according to Newton's first law of motion.
Balanced forces acting on an object do not change the object's position.
False. Balanced forces acting on an object will not change the object's velocity. When forces are balanced, there is no change in the object's velocity as there is no net force acting on the object.
Yes, it is possible for an object to not be in motion and still have forces acting on it. This situation could occur if the forces acting on the object are balanced, resulting in a state of equilibrium where there is no net force causing motion.
Forces acting on an object that produce a change in its motion are known as net force. Net force is calculated by combining all the individual forces acting on the object in the same direction.
Yes, it is possible for an object to have several forces acting on it and still not change its motion if the forces are balanced or cancel each other out. When the net force on an object is zero (resultant force is zero), the object will remain in its state of motion (either at rest or moving at a constant velocity) according to Newton's first law of motion.
Yes, as long as all of the forces cancel out.
Balanced forces acting on an object do not change the object's position.
A force, or several forces that don't add up to zero, acting on the object.
False. Balanced forces acting on an object will not change the object's velocity. When forces are balanced, there is no change in the object's velocity as there is no net force acting on the object.
Yes, it is possible for an object to not be in motion and still have forces acting on it. This situation could occur if the forces acting on the object are balanced, resulting in a state of equilibrium where there is no net force causing motion.
bob
An object with balanced forces acting on it is still. An object with unbalanced forces acting on them moves at an non constant velocity. It is possible for an object to have balanced forces acting on it and yet move in a vacuum.
Yes, the object can have equal forces acting in opposite directions: 5N ->[]<- 5N The object will have forces acting upon it, but will not move.
Forces acting on an object that produce a change in its motion are known as net force. Net force is calculated by combining all the individual forces acting on the object in the same direction.
An object with balanced forces acting on it is still. An object with unbalanced forces acting on them moves at an non constant velocity. It is possible for an object to have balanced forces acting on it and yet move in a vacuum.
Change the Direction, Change the Speed and Change the Shape :)