Technically no. Temperature is effectively the average speed of the particles. If you don't have any particles then you have no temperature. Although an Infra-red detector would work, and Infra-red radiation causes heating, that would not be the temperature.
Also, this is all theoretical anyway since total vacuums do not exist.
In a vacuum temperature is inapplicable. Temperature is a measure of the kinetic energy of the molecules that fill a defined space. In a vacuum there are no molecules so --- no temperature.
The third unit of measure for temperature is Kelvin (K). It is an absolute temperature scale where zero represents absolute zero, the lowest possible temperature achievable.
In an absolutely perfect vacuum, there is no defined temperature at all. The temperature simply doesn't mean anything. Of course, there isn't really anything that is a perfect vacuum.At very high vacuum, at equilibrium, the temperature will be determined by whatever the container holding the vacuum is in thermal contact with. Something inside an imperfect vacuum isn't at any particular temperature -- if it is at equilibrium, it will be at whatever temperature the things around it are at. However, the rate at which is reaches equilibrium with may be very slow because of the vacuum. If it not at equilibrium, then the object in the vacuum will be at whatever temperature it was set at until it reaches equilibrium with the things around it.
-273.15 degrees Celsius is known as absolute zero, the theoretical lowest possible temperature where all molecular motion ceases. It is impossible to measure a temperature below this because it represents a state where energy is at its minimum possible level in a system, making further cooling impossible.
Theoretical maximum vacuum would be a perfect vacuum where there are no particles present. In practice, the highest vacuum achieved is around 10^-13 torr in ultra-high vacuum systems.
In a vacuum temperature is inapplicable. Temperature is a measure of the kinetic energy of the molecules that fill a defined space. In a vacuum there are no molecules so --- no temperature.
Whatever they were designed to measure be it pressure, vacuum, temperature, volume, etc.
The proper way to take the temperature of vacuum packed foods is with a metal stem thermometer. To take the correct temperature, put the thermometer in the center of the food.
Technically no. Temperature is effectively the average speed of the particles. If you don't have any particles then you have no temperature. Although an Infra-red detector would work, and Infra-red radiation causes heating, that would not be the temperature. Also, this is all theoretical anyway since total vacuums do not exist.
The third unit of measure for temperature is Kelvin (K). It is an absolute temperature scale where zero represents absolute zero, the lowest possible temperature achievable.
No. The thermometer measures the temperature of mass or material. Concerning the moon, a thermometer could measure the temperature of dust or rock on the surface. If it were not in contact with the surface, and the sun shone on it, the thermometer would read the temperature to which the sun heated it. If it were shielded from the sun, then the thermometer would read the temperature of space ... about 3 K, or darn near absolute zero.
In an absolutely perfect vacuum, there is no defined temperature at all. The temperature simply doesn't mean anything. Of course, there isn't really anything that is a perfect vacuum.At very high vacuum, at equilibrium, the temperature will be determined by whatever the container holding the vacuum is in thermal contact with. Something inside an imperfect vacuum isn't at any particular temperature -- if it is at equilibrium, it will be at whatever temperature the things around it are at. However, the rate at which is reaches equilibrium with may be very slow because of the vacuum. If it not at equilibrium, then the object in the vacuum will be at whatever temperature it was set at until it reaches equilibrium with the things around it.
A thermometer will completely drop when in a vacuum as there is nothing in a vacuum, so there will be no energy. A thermometer measures heat energy around it. You may find it'll measure the heat energy that it has itself. In a vacuum, a thermometer cannot measure temperature via convection heating. Hot air or hot gas can't heat up the bulb or bimetal strip or whatever it is that responds to the heat to make the device work. It will measure some heat because infrared (and other electromagnetic) radiation can warm the device. Depending on the circumstances, it will give some kind of reading, but as to what that reading is, we cannot know without knowing what is in or around the vacuum. Even in deep space there is cosmic background radiation everywhere and the temperature is about 3 K, or −270 °C (−454.00 °F).
To create vacuum. Heat doesn't travel from one side to the other (in either direction) if there is no matter. Temperature is basically a measure of the amount of vibrational energy particles have. No particles, no temperature, except via eletromagnetic radiation, which can travel through vacuum.
-273.15 degrees Celsius is known as absolute zero, the theoretical lowest possible temperature where all molecular motion ceases. It is impossible to measure a temperature below this because it represents a state where energy is at its minimum possible level in a system, making further cooling impossible.
In a vacuum, water does not change temperature since temperature is a measure of average kinetic energy of molecules, which in turn depends on molecular collisions that require a medium. Without air or molecules to transfer heat, water cannot gain or lose temperature in a vacuum.
vacuum is a volume of space that is essentially empty of matter, such that its gaseous pressure is much less than atmospheric pressure. The word comes from the Latin term for "empty".Now, u tell me if u measure it by BAR or temp?Though T is directly proportionate to P, measurement of pressure with temperature in a vacuum cleaner is an absurdist theory.