answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Yes, it is compulsory that either the attractive forces or the repulsive forces be stronger.an atom has either +ve charge or -ve charge.if positive charge is stronger than negative charge in any atom then forces of attraction will be stronger. if positive charge is weaker than negative charge then forces of repulsion will dominate.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

One needs merely to look at the situation. If the elements in question come together, then attractive fores are greater. If they move apart then the repulsive forces are greater. Kinda obvious, don't ya think?

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

no. That is all i know. The force of attraction is larger than the force of repulsion.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

The chemical bonds in water are much stronger--more than ten times stronger-- than the attractive forces (generally, hydrogen bonds).

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Finding a good janitorial service can be very difficult. The best site though to find reviews for these types of companies across the nation is www.cleaningservicesfinder.com/ .

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is the force of repulsion stronger than the force of attraction?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Is the nuclear force a force of attraction or repulsion or both?

It is only attractive in nature. I am not sure which nuclear force you talk about. Electrical forces of the nucleus are repulsive to the positively charged. There are "strong forces" and the like which are attractive.


Why there is no repulsion between the protons within nucleus?

There is a stronger force, stronger than the electrostatic force, that keeps nucleons (protons and neutrons) together. It is not enough to hold two protons together if they are alone, but the neutrons provide additional attraction. This force is known as the "strong force".There is a stronger force, stronger than the electrostatic force, that keeps nucleons (protons and neutrons) together. It is not enough to hold two protons together if they are alone, but the neutrons provide additional attraction. This force is known as the "strong force".There is a stronger force, stronger than the electrostatic force, that keeps nucleons (protons and neutrons) together. It is not enough to hold two protons together if they are alone, but the neutrons provide additional attraction. This force is known as the "strong force".There is a stronger force, stronger than the electrostatic force, that keeps nucleons (protons and neutrons) together. It is not enough to hold two protons together if they are alone, but the neutrons provide additional attraction. This force is known as the "strong force".


The nucleus holds what?

The nuclear membrane nuclear membrane strong nuclear force, stronger than electrostatic repulsion


Why two or more protons get to gether?

Two protons alone won't stick together - their electrostatic repulsion is too strong. If there are also neutrons involved, the strong force can become stronger than the electrostatic repulsion - for example, in the simplest case of Helium-3, two protons and one neutron will stick together. The neutron helps provide the strong force to keep the protons together; the two protons by themselves don't have enough attraction through the strong force to overcome the electrostatic repulsion.


Are covalent bonds stronger than ionic?

No. Ionic bonds are typically stronger. it is because ionic bond has more intermolecular force of attraction.


Why does the repulsion between lone pairs are stronger than the repulsion between bonding pairs or between one bonding pair and a lone pair?

The repulsion between lone pairs are stronger than the repulsion between bonding pairs between one bonding pair and lone pair due to electrostatic interactions.


Why is an ionic bond stronger than a covalent bond?

Covalent bond is made up of electrostatic attraction but ionic bond is made up of weak waalander's force of attraction


Is an ionic bond stronger than a covalent?

Covalent bond is made up of electrostatic attraction but ionic bond is made up of weak waalander's force of attraction


What evidence suggests that nuclear forces have a powerful force of attraction?

Many atoms have nuclei consisting of several protons packed into an extremely small volume. Each proton has a positive charge, and since positive charges repel each other, the theory of electromagnetism says that these nuclei must not exist in a stable state. The fact that they do indeed exist leads us to believe that there is a force holding the protons together which must be stronger than the electromagnetic force. We call this force the strong nuclear force. In summary, the fact that protons are held together in nuclei despite their electric repulsion is evidence that there is a force (called the strong nuclear force) which is stronger than their electric repulsion.


The attraction among water molecules is stronger than the attraction among?

carbon dioxide molecules


Is the attraction between steel particles stronger than the attraction between copper particles?

yes


Can planets repel each other along with attraction?

Gravity is a force of attraction only. Newton's law describes only an inverse square attraction, which is different than the inverse square law of electric charge which allows both attraction and repulsion. Within the theory of general relativity, gravity has a different interpretation as curvature of space-time, but that is not essential to the present question.