No. There is no possibility whatsoever of a nuclear power plant having a nuclear explosion. It is not physically, or even theoretically, possible for the core to be brought into a super-prompt critical geometry and held there long enough to consume enough fuel to "go nuclear".
No, a nuclear explosion on a nuclear power plant would not cause the explosion radius to increase. The explosion radius would be determined by the yield of the nuclear weapon itself, not by the presence of the power plant.
The Chernobyl power plant was a nuclear power plant that used a reactor to produce electricity. It generated power by splitting atoms in a process called nuclear fission, which released energy that was converted into electricity. However, a catastrophic explosion and fire occurred at the plant in 1986, resulting in the worst nuclear disaster in history.
The cause of a nuclear power plant explosion can be due to a loss of cooling water leading to overheating and a buildup of pressure, resulting in a steam explosion. The effect can range from release of radioactive materials into the environment, potential contamination of air, water, and soil, and long-term health and environmental consequences for nearby populations.
The largest nuclear plant meltdown happened at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine on April 26, 1986. The explosion and subsequent fire released large amounts of radioactive material into the atmosphere, resulting in one of the worst nuclear disasters in history.
AnswerThere would be a gigantic explosion AnswerThe force of the actual explosion would depend entirely on the bomb. The material in the power plant would almost certainly not contribute to the force of the explosion in any way. Nuclear explosions are not merely a matter of achieving critical mass; the critical mass has to be maintained while the explosion takes place, which is not easy. The environmental damage done by the bomb would probably be worse than if it had gone off in some other place, because the radioactive material at the power plant would be scattered to some unpredictable extent.Nuclear power plants are never, or nearly never, built in cities because of the possibility of accident. A nuclear bomb hitting a nuclear power plant would possibly cause fewer fatalities than a bomb hitting a city.
No, a nuclear explosion on a nuclear power plant would not cause the explosion radius to increase. The explosion radius would be determined by the yield of the nuclear weapon itself, not by the presence of the power plant.
lots
radiological not toxicological
no it was caused by the tectonic plates the nuclear plant disaster happened because of the earthquake
The Chernobyl power plant was a nuclear power plant that used a reactor to produce electricity. It generated power by splitting atoms in a process called nuclear fission, which released energy that was converted into electricity. However, a catastrophic explosion and fire occurred at the plant in 1986, resulting in the worst nuclear disaster in history.
The cause of a nuclear power plant explosion can be due to a loss of cooling water leading to overheating and a buildup of pressure, resulting in a steam explosion. The effect can range from release of radioactive materials into the environment, potential contamination of air, water, and soil, and long-term health and environmental consequences for nearby populations.
what is the existing of nuclear power plant?
what is negative of the nuclear power plant
The largest nuclear plant meltdown happened at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine on April 26, 1986. The explosion and subsequent fire released large amounts of radioactive material into the atmosphere, resulting in one of the worst nuclear disasters in history.
There is no nuclear power plant in Alaska.
A nuclear reactor exploded in 1986 at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine. The explosion released a large amount of radioactive material into the atmosphere, making it one of the worst nuclear disasters in history.
Nuclear Fallout comes from a nuclear power plant.