0
What else can I help you with?
Some argue that wind power should be used much more than it is now what argument could someone make against the use of wind power?
One argument against wind power is that it is intermittent and dependent on weather conditions, leading to inconsistent energy generation. Additionally, the visual impact and noise associated with wind turbines can be a concern for some communities. Finally, there are challenges with integrating wind power into existing energy grids due to its variability.
Some argue that wind power should be used much more than it is now. What argument could someone make against the use of wind power?
One argument against wind power is that it is intermittent and dependent on weather conditions, leading to reliability issues in providing a consistent energy supply. Critics also raise concerns about the impact of wind turbines on wildlife and the visual aesthetics of landscapes. Additionally, the upfront costs and land requirements for large-scale wind farms are seen as potential disadvantages.
Some argue that wind power should be used more than it is now. What argument could someone make against the use of wind power?
It can only be used in windy parts of the country.
What argument could someone make againist the use of wind power?
Someone could argue against the use of wind power by pointing out that wind energy is intermittent and not always reliable, leading to variability in energy production. They could also mention concerns about the impact on wildlife, such as birds and bats, from wind turbines. Additionally, some people may argue that the construction and maintenance of wind turbines can have negative effects on the visual landscape or local communities.
Some argue solar power should be the main energy source of the US which argument can be used against this idea?
One argument against relying solely on solar power as the main energy source for the US is its intermittency. Solar power generation is dependent on sunlight, making it unreliable during periods of low or no sunlight (nighttime or cloudy days). This could pose challenges in meeting consistent energy demands, especially during peak usage times. Additionally, the upfront costs of transitioning to a fully solar-powered system on a national scale may be prohibitive.
What is the verb for argument?
Arguement means a uncertain conversation that starts when two or more than two pople does not agree with other statements.
Some argue that solar power should be the main energy source for the US Which argument could be used against this?
it can only be used in sunny areas
What is the noun form of argue?
Argument. People who "argue" can be said to be having an "argument".
Is argument a verb?
To argue is a verb, an argument is a noun.
What does it mean to have someone testify for or against you?
If you testify against, you argue against them.. If you testify for then, you agree with them and support them
Which of the following is true of a thesis statement?
a;; of the above are correct.
Is the word argue a noun?
No, the word argue is a verb. Argument would be the equivalent noun.
Is there a convincing argument against suicide?
There are many varying opinions on this. Personally I believe there are many convincing arguments against suicide. I am not religious so i will leave those arguments for someone else. The most convincing argument I can think of is that when things are bad or when life is bad they/it almost always get better. When someone is depressed they have trouble realizing that and feel it will never get better. There are certain cases, most of them with terminal illness or with someone who has permanently lost control or function of their body that make this argument harder to argue.
What does you can't argue with ignorance mean?
Generally when people argue, they argue by comparing the facts that they have. The person whose facts are more compelling wins the argument. An ignorant person does not know any facts. A person who argues with no facts argues with emotion or opinion based on nothing that can be checked or verified by the other side. It is not possible to argue against nothing (no facts.) So while a person who has no facts to bolster his argument can continue arguing, it is a fruitless argument; hence, you can't argue with ignorance. The ignorant person may walk away from an argument believing himself or herself to have won -- not because he or she had the better argument based on facts that could be checked by the other side - but because he or she used opinion or feelings to bolster his or her "argument."
The basic argument against restricting civil liberties?
One of the most basic arguments against restricting civil liberties is that the government does not, or should not, have the power to do so in the first place. Many argue that restricting civil liberties violates freedoms protected in the Constitution.
What is a j ayers key argument against ethical objectivism?
That we cannot argue ethics and it being impossible to agure shows ethics to be nonobjective.
How do you write the word argument as a verb?
Argue
