we have no clue u stupid people!!!!
A speaker uses logical reasoning, evidence, and clear communication to make a sound argument. This involves presenting credible facts, examples, and reasoning to support their claims and persuade the audience. By structuring their argument effectively and addressing counterarguments, a speaker can strengthen the credibility and persuasiveness of their position.
To prove that something is true, you need to provide evidence, logical reasoning, and potentially empirical data that supports your statement. This can involve conducting experiments, citing reliable sources, or presenting a valid argument based on sound principles. Additionally, repeatable results and the consensus of experts in the field can also contribute to verifying the truth of a claim.
A balanced argument presents both sides of an issue without bias, allowing for a fair assessment of the topic. It involves acknowledging different perspectives and providing evidence or reasoning to support each viewpoint. Ultimately, a balanced argument aims to help readers or listeners make informed decisions based on a comprehensive understanding of all sides of the argument.
A circular argument is a logical fallacy in which the conclusion is supported by the premise, which in turn is based on the conclusion. It does not provide any new information or evidence to support the argument. It's a form of reasoning that goes in a circle without ever reaching a logical conclusion.
An unbalanced argument is one that presents a skewed or disproportionate view, often by focusing only on one side of an issue while ignoring or dismissing counterarguments or differing perspectives. This can lead to a lack of objectivity and potentially misrepresentation of the topic being discussed.
treatise
He proved abiogenesis is wrong by experiments using long neck bottle technique .
you could go to the coucil and say i don't want people experimenting on animals
An expository essay.
It explained that government was formed by a social contract. He imagined a time in the distant past when people first got together and created a government for themselves. Then he explained what a proper government should do.
It explained that government was formed by a social contract. He imagined a time in the distant past when people first got together and created a government for themselves. Then he explained what a proper government should do.
It was known as the Freeport Doctrine.
Valid arguments are not described as strong or weak. Validity refers to the logical structure of an argument - if the premises logically lead to the conclusion. An argument can be valid but still weak if the premises are not well-supported or sound.
The argument from morality posits that moral values point towards the existence of a higher being that establishes objective moral truths. While this argument persuades some individuals, others argue that morality can be explained through evolutionary processes or societal constructs, making it a debated topic among philosophers and theologians. Ultimately, the strength of this argument depends on one's perspective and beliefs.
The Frederick Douglas speech can be described in one way. I would say the speech was a argument.
Louis Pasteur settled the spontaneous generation argument by conducting experiments that demonstrated the presence of microorganisms in the air and refuting the idea that they could arise spontaneously. His experiments showed that microorganisms enter solutions from the air, leading to the concept of biogenesis, which states that living organisms only come from other living organisms.
In programming, an argument takes a value or vales and performs an operation is called a function or method. If a method does not return a value, it is described as 'void'.