0
What else can I help you with?
What term describes the tendency for objects to resist in motion?
Inertia is the term that describes the tendency of objects to resist changes in their state of motion.
What would happen if there was no inertia?
Without inertia, objects would not resist changes in their motion. This means that any force applied to an object would instantly change its speed or direction, making it impossible to move or control objects effectively. The concept of momentum would not exist, leading to chaotic and unpredictable movements of objects.
Do objects have inertia only when they are moving?
Inertia is the tendency of an object to resist a change in motion. An object would have inertia while moving and also while at rest.
Does a change in motion occur only if a net force is exerted on an object?
No. Changes in motion can occur in other ways. A change in motion can occur if that object exerts a net force on another object, like another ball on a billiard table. The object could also bump into an immovable object and its motion would change.
Does motin occurs when there is a change in speed?
ans: do you mean motion? motion is the meaning to move relative to something else, and it occurs (or is seen to be occurring) when two objects pass each other that have different velocities (not necessarily changing velocities). Without this, you would not be able to perceive motion at all. Motion doesn't mean speed has to change, as that relates simply to acceleration.
What term describes the tendency for objects to resist in motion?
Inertia is the term that describes the tendency of objects to resist changes in their state of motion.
What would happen if there was no inertia?
Without inertia, objects would not resist changes in their motion. This means that any force applied to an object would instantly change its speed or direction, making it impossible to move or control objects effectively. The concept of momentum would not exist, leading to chaotic and unpredictable movements of objects.
Do objects have inertia only when they are moving?
Inertia is the tendency of an object to resist a change in motion. An object would have inertia while moving and also while at rest.
What would describe the tendency for objects to resist change in motion?
Inertia
Does a change in motion occur only if a net force is exerted on an object?
No. Changes in motion can occur in other ways. A change in motion can occur if that object exerts a net force on another object, like another ball on a billiard table. The object could also bump into an immovable object and its motion would change.
Does motin occurs when there is a change in speed?
ans: do you mean motion? motion is the meaning to move relative to something else, and it occurs (or is seen to be occurring) when two objects pass each other that have different velocities (not necessarily changing velocities). Without this, you would not be able to perceive motion at all. Motion doesn't mean speed has to change, as that relates simply to acceleration.
IS THE FRICTIONAL FORCE THAT ACTS ON OBJECTS THAT ARE NOT MOVING?
Yes, the frictional force acts on objects that are not moving, opposing the motion that would occur if there were no friction present. This static friction force prevents the object from moving until a force greater than the static friction force is applied.
What would if there would be no friction?
If there were no friction, objects would not experience resistance when moving against a surface. This would result in perpetual motion, making it difficult to stop objects once they are in motion. Additionally, machinery and vehicles would operate more efficiently without the energy losses caused by friction.
Why is it easier to change the motion of an object with a small mass than it is to change the motion of an object with a large mass?
F=mxa, m = can be small or large, a = change the motion (acceleration), F = the cause of the change the motion F1 changes the motion of m1 at a F2 changes the motion of m2 at a (same force, same size mass) (F1+F2) changes the motion of (m1 +m2) at a So it takes twice the force (F1+F2) to move twice the mass (m1 + m2) at the same change in motion (acceleration). If (F1 + F2) were to move smaller mass (m1) the acceleration would be larger. The "why" is hidden in the formula.
What would happen if this force ceased to exist?
If the force ceased to exist, its effects on matter and objects would disappear. Depending on the force in question, this could lead to changes in motion, interactions between particles, or structural integrity of objects. The absence of a force may result in a lack of movement, stability, or cohesion in the affected systems.
Two objects in constant motion of atoms and molecules is not so obvious?
At the atomic and molecular level, objects are in constant motion due to thermal energy, contributing to the overall random motion. This motion is not immediately obvious at the macroscopic level. The kinetic energy of the particles causes constant collisions and interactions, which results in the random movement of the objects.
How would the behavior of objects in our solar system be different if Newton's laws of motion only applied within its boundaries?
If Newton's laws of motion only applied within our solar system, the behavior of objects outside of it would not follow those laws. This means that the motion of objects like comets, asteroids, and spacecraft traveling between different solar systems would not be accurately predicted by Newton's laws. The gravitational interactions and trajectories of these objects would be different, potentially leading to unexpected outcomes and challenges in space exploration.
