A black hole is a region in space where gravity is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape from it. A white hole, on the other hand, is a hypothetical region in space where matter and light can only escape from it and nothing can enter. In simple terms, a black hole pulls everything in, while a white hole pushes everything out.
The relationship between the mass of a black hole and its density is that as the mass of a black hole increases, its density also increases. This means that a black hole with a higher mass will have a higher density compared to a black hole with a lower mass.
A white hole is a theoretical concept in astrophysics that is the opposite of a black hole. While a black hole is a region in space where gravity is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape, a white hole is a hypothetical region where matter and light can only escape and nothing can enter. In terms of appearance, a white hole would appear as a bright, glowing object emitting energy and matter, in contrast to the dark, invisible nature of a black hole.
When a white hole and a black hole collide, it is theorized that they would cancel each other out, resulting in the release of a burst of energy. This event is purely hypothetical as white holes have not been observed in nature.
When a black hole collides with a white hole, it is theorized that they would cancel each other out, resulting in the release of energy and potentially creating a new type of cosmic event.
When a white hole and a black hole collide, it is theorized that they would cancel each other out, resulting in the release of energy and potentially creating a new type of cosmic event. This collision is purely hypothetical as white holes have not been observed in nature.
A white dwarf is a white hot solid ball of nickel-iron alloy, a black hole is an infinitesimal singularity of infinite density surrounded by total emptiness.
the differece is a just like black hole and gutter hole.
See related questions.
Largely the difference between a Schwarzchild black hole and a Kerr black hole is about spin; the Schwarzchild model is not spinning, and is modeled to have a spherical shape and point-like singularity. The Kerr model by contrast has significant spin which would give rise to a ring-shaped singularity and also the ergosphere, having a oblate spheroidal shape.
Since whit holes only exist mathematically, a black hole could not pull in a white hole.
There is a theory that tells that when you fall in a black hole, you are not destroyed but you are "teleported" to a white hole. The wormhole is a inter-dimensional tunnel that connects a black hole to a white hole.
They are separate phenomenon and different principals are in action.
A Schwarzschild black hole is a non-rotating black hole. The Kerr black hole is a rotating black hole. Since the latter is more complicated to describe, it was developed much later.A Schwarzschild black hole is a non-rotating black hole. The Kerr black hole is a rotating black hole. Since the latter is more complicated to describe, it was developed much later.A Schwarzschild black hole is a non-rotating black hole. The Kerr black hole is a rotating black hole. Since the latter is more complicated to describe, it was developed much later.A Schwarzschild black hole is a non-rotating black hole. The Kerr black hole is a rotating black hole. Since the latter is more complicated to describe, it was developed much later.
Theoretically, a black hole can destroy anything.
The answer is, if a black hole 'ate' another black hole, it would gain more mass, therefore it's event horizon(or area of influence) would increase. Once you cross the 'event horizon' it's a gravitational no return. Per the White Hole: It is found in theoretical science only. There has no proof of any white hole found (there has for black holes.) White hole ideas are not accepted by mainstream physicists, but a white hole may be the end product of the transmission of black hole matter in some part of the universe. If white holes exist the connection of a black hole to a white hole might actually be a wormhole or tunnel through 3 dimensional space. Black holes do have size and mass: if they did not have size, the difference in the size of the event horizon between black holes would not exist. The size of a black hole can be defined several ways - the gravitational force it generates (the mass), the physical size of the even horizon, or the size of an accretion disk (if there is one.) The problem most people have with the size of a black hole is that the very center of the black hole is a singularity: something that has no physical properties we can understand: it is so different that the word had to be made to describe it. In the sphere shells around the black hole are: the rest of the universe, "empty" space, matter and energy being bent (but not falling into the black hole), matter and energy falling into the black hole, (these 2 often show as an accretion disk), then the event horizon where the gravitational force is so strong now that even light can no longer escape, then the inner shell after the event horizon and this falls all the way down to the center, the singularity. Everything but the singularity has size, mass and is hot compared to the rest of hte universe (empty space again.) A black hole is an amazing thing but not a magical thing - it would probably be better if we used the term earler used - frozen star: one that no longer gives off heat.
Actually one interpretation of the big bang is as a white hole, the inverse of a black hole.
The relationship between the mass of a black hole and its density is that as the mass of a black hole increases, its density also increases. This means that a black hole with a higher mass will have a higher density compared to a black hole with a lower mass.