Nuclear bombs are so powerful, and release so much radioactive fallout, that any large-scale use of nuclear bombs would kill everbody and make the world uninhabitable.
Some concerns about nuclear power include the potential for accidents, such as meltdowns, which can have serious environmental and health consequences, as demonstrated by incidents like Chernobyl and Fukushima. There is also the issue of long-term storage of nuclear waste, as it remains radioactive and hazardous for thousands of years. Additionally, the high cost of building and maintaining nuclear power plants makes them less economically competitive compared to other forms of energy.
Nuclear energy has the potential to generate a large amount of power with minimal greenhouse gas emissions, making it a viable option for addressing climate change. However, the risks associated with nuclear accidents, nuclear waste disposal, and proliferation of nuclear weapons are major concerns that need to be carefully managed to ensure the safe use of nuclear energy.
Nuclear reactions can be both good and bad. They can produce clean energy, like in nuclear power plants, but also be used to create nuclear weapons which have destructive capabilities. The key is in how nuclear reactions are managed and controlled.
nukes are not "bad for countries" but they have devistating side affects, for example: the cities of nagisaki and hiroshima are still highly radiated due to the original atomic bombs which were droped there.
The atomic bomb has devastating humanitarian consequences, causing mass casualties and destruction. It also raises ethical concerns due to its indiscriminate nature and potential for long-lasting radiation effects on human health and the environment. Additionally, the proliferation of nuclear weapons poses a significant risk of escalation in conflicts and potential nuclear warfare.
some bad uses are nuclear bombs.
Some people would think that helping develop the first nuclear reactor was a 'bad thing.'
ProsThe are some of the strongest bombs. They can end wars.What the bomb doesn't destroy, the radiation will.ConsThey are bad for the environment. They could easily kill innocent people.They are big and heavy.
Energy. How we use it makes it a good thing or a bad thing.
There's no such thing as a bad element. Take arsenic, for instance. It is very poisonous so you might call it a bad element. But you can't make silicon chips or LEDs without arsenic, so it's a good element. Plutonium is another one. They make nuclear bombs out of it. Bad element? Not if you're fueling your nuclear reactor with it and powering a city with the electricity.
Nuclear radiation is neither good nor bad, it is a natural phenomenon. Natural phenomena cannot be good or bad (this is an ethical/moral judgement), they are simply facts.
Good: it's a clean energy Bad: if it blows up well...yeah it would be bad :/
Not everyone claims it's bad. Some advocate that the lives it took that day saved the US and Japan the more severe losses that conventional warfare would've cost them. Of course, resorting to nuclear bombs can never be truly justified.
Because the nuclear fission area could explode
Some concerns about nuclear power include the potential for accidents, such as meltdowns, which can have serious environmental and health consequences, as demonstrated by incidents like Chernobyl and Fukushima. There is also the issue of long-term storage of nuclear waste, as it remains radioactive and hazardous for thousands of years. Additionally, the high cost of building and maintaining nuclear power plants makes them less economically competitive compared to other forms of energy.
To give a nice name to a bad thing.
nuclear is good and bad at the same time.