Challenges in controlling plasma at extremely high temperatures, finding materials that can withstand harsh conditions, and high energy costs required for research and development are some reasons why practical fusion reactors have not been developed yet. Additional factors include the complexity of the technology, regulatory hurdles, and the need for international collaboration.
Currently, fusion reactors are still in the experimental stage and do not produce electricity for the grid. The output power of experimental fusion reactors ranges from a few megawatts to tens of megawatts, depending on the design and scale of the reactor. Commercial fusion reactors, when developed, are expected to generate hundreds of megawatts to gigawatts of power.
Yes, the sun is a nuclear fusion reactor.
A fusion reactor that needs more energy than it produces would not be economically viable or practical for power generation. The purpose of building a fusion reactor is to generate more energy than it consumes, in order to provide a sustainable and efficient source of power. If it cannot achieve this goal, it defeats the purpose of investing in fusion energy technology.
Nuclear fission is the method currently used for generating energy, while nuclear fusion is still being developed for practical use.
Fusion reactors have not been developed and built yet because it is a complex and challenging process to control and sustain nuclear fusion reactions at a scale that is practical for energy production. Scientists are still working on overcoming technical and engineering obstacles to make fusion power a viable and reliable source of energy.
Currently, fusion reactors are still in the experimental stage and do not produce electricity for the grid. The output power of experimental fusion reactors ranges from a few megawatts to tens of megawatts, depending on the design and scale of the reactor. Commercial fusion reactors, when developed, are expected to generate hundreds of megawatts to gigawatts of power.
Yes, the sun is a nuclear fusion reactor.
explain how a fusion reactor would be similar to a fission reaction
A fusion reactor that needs more energy than it produces would not be economically viable or practical for power generation. The purpose of building a fusion reactor is to generate more energy than it consumes, in order to provide a sustainable and efficient source of power. If it cannot achieve this goal, it defeats the purpose of investing in fusion energy technology.
The Sun is an immense fusion reactor in space. It generates energy through nuclear fusion reactions at its core, converting hydrogen into helium and releasing vast amounts of energy in the process.
Deutrium and tritium are needed as fuel in fusion reactor.
no
No
solar is a billion times better.
It can't as nobody has figured out how to make a fusion reactor.
No. "Reactors" contain fission reactions. No useful way of containing fusionon an industrial scale outside the laboratory has been developed yet.Edit: Tomak fusion reactors currently produce 10 times the energy that is put into them. The historical increase into the gain of fusion reactors has bettered the increase of capacity of DRAMs. The only reason that that it "isn't out of the laboratory" is because when you build a fusion reactor, it is usually called a laboratory.
No design of a fusion reactor has yet been able to reach what is called breakeven: the ability to make as much energy as it takes to operate the reactor. Until a prototype fusion reactor can make enough energy to operate itself, it is useless to even consider the uses of fusion reactions in possible power plants of the future.The temperature of a fusion reaction is not only high enough to melt any matter it touches but to vaporize that matter into a plasma! Therefore the reacting materials and their products must be confined in the reactor using forcefields not matter. We do not yet know how to make strong enough forcefields reliably.