Tell you what: We'll calculate how much work is done by the force, not how
much kinetic energy the plane picks up, and then we'll tell you why.
The work done is (force) x (distance) = (5,000) x (500) = 2,500,000 joules.
Whenever we do these force/distance/work/energy problems, we always ignore
friction, air resistance, etc. because it's just too hard and complicated to take
all of them into consideration, and it would only get in the way of understanding
the basic principles anyway.
How valid is the answer we get when we ignore these things ? Well, it may be OK,
and pretty close to reality, for baseballs, stones, bullets, and bricks. But it's definitely
not OK for airplanes. Airplanes are designed specifically to have an intimate relationship
with the air, and that's the only reason they work at all.
If you do 2.5 million joules of work on a Baseball, a stone, or even a little red wagon,
it may have close to 2.5 million joules of kinetic energy when you stop pushing. But
an airplane won't. It's designed to use some of that K.E. to move air, to generate
LIFT, with the ultimate objective of getting off of the ground. That drains away
a big part of the work done to roll down the runway, and that's the big part that
will never show up as kinetic energy.
Say you are moving an object against the carpet flooring, you are the force and you are causing the object to move as well as you are creating friction between the carpet and the object. The force would be called the netforce, which is all the forces that are acting on an object.
If the net force on an object is zero then the object has zero acceleration, meaning that the speed and direction of its motion aren't changing.
Yes. Newton's law, F=ma, should be interpreted as netforce equals mass times acceleration; net force meaning that all forces should be taken into account. If the accelrating force of gravitation (plus froce from the motor, if it is used) is exactly compensated by a braking force of friction, then the acceleration will be zero - speed will be constant.
Sure. Consider a good old Tug 'o War, with 3 or more strong guys pulling invarious directions, and that big old knot in the middle of the rope right over themud pit isn't moving an inch. (Remember, it would move immediately if the netforce on it were not zero.)Maybe an even better example is to consider 50 people evenly distributed allthe way around a small car, all pushing on the car in different directions. It'svery plausible that the car doesn't roll at all ... the net force on it is zero.
The duration of NetForce - film - is 3.33 hours.
NetForce - film - was created on 1999-02-01.
sdklfnmsdvk;niorgjriegjeriotu34857456745674fngdfjkvnfuigerhgui 650968546696056984688456984568468546 hi and minecraft is awesome!!!!!!!!!!!
NetForce - 1999 TV is rated/received certificates of: Finland:K-12 Germany:16 Greece:K-13 Iceland:12 Netherlands:12 UK:15 USA:R
Gravity.
unbalanced same balanced doesn't = 0 push or pull netforce = 0 change an have direction doesn't change motion objects motion
NetForce - 1999 TV was released on: Canada: 1 February 1999 USA: 1 February 1999 Norway: 4 August 1999 Germany: 10 August 1999 Finland: September 1999 (DVD premiere) Japan: 22 September 1999 (video premiere) France: 22 July 2000 Hong Kong: 2 December 2000 Sweden: 9 December 2001
Say you are moving an object against the carpet flooring, you are the force and you are causing the object to move as well as you are creating friction between the carpet and the object. The force would be called the netforce, which is all the forces that are acting on an object.
Adam Kassen has: Played Carl Besser in "NetForce" in 1999. Played Justin Tanner in "The District" in 2000. Played Brady Bunch 2nd AD in "Growing Up Brady" in 2000. Played Scott in "The Division" in 2001. Played Young Doctor in "Puncture" in 2011.
The question is quite difficult to address, because it so perfectly blends so manymisconceptions and faulty descriptions.-- If you want to talk about "velocity" then you must include the direction in whicheach body is moving. That detail has profound implications on our knowledge of theforce that is apparently causing the motion.-- If a body is moving in a straight line at a constant speed, then there is NO netforce acting on it.-- If a net force is acting on the body and its speed is constant, then it must bemoving in a curved path.-- If the distances traveled are the same, then the speed doesn't matter.-- Work is the product of (force) x (distance). If equal forces move throughequal distances, then equal work is done by both forces. The speed doesn'tmatter. Neither does the size, weight, mass, color, or gender preference ofthe objects being pushed.
If the net force on an object is zero then the object has zero acceleration, meaning that the speed and direction of its motion aren't changing.
Yes. Newton's law, F=ma, should be interpreted as netforce equals mass times acceleration; net force meaning that all forces should be taken into account. If the accelrating force of gravitation (plus froce from the motor, if it is used) is exactly compensated by a braking force of friction, then the acceleration will be zero - speed will be constant.