Neutrons are subatomic particles found in the nucleus of an atom along with protons. They have no electric charge, and their presence helps stabilize the nucleus of the atom. Neutrons play a crucial role in nuclear reactions and are essential for the formation of elements in stars through processes like nuclear fusion.
"All subatomic particles have the same mass" is not a true statement, as different subatomic particles, such as protons, neutrons, and electrons, have different masses and charges.
Subatomic particles are the same size as basketballs.
Proof by Converse is a logical fallacy where one asserts that if the converse of a statement is true, then the original statement must also be true. However, this is not always the case as the converse of a statement may not always hold true even if the original statement is true. It is important to avoid this error in logical reasoning.
True statements: All neutrons are alike, all electrons are alike, all protons are alike (All atoms of a given isotope is only alike). False statement: All atoms are alike All atoms are not alike as they may vary in the number of protons / electrons / neutrons.
The protons and the neutrons are located in the nucleus of an atom.
Neutrons have no charge, but they do have mass.
They can be found in the nucleus.
"All subatomic particles have the same mass" is not a true statement, as different subatomic particles, such as protons, neutrons, and electrons, have different masses and charges.
The right answer is B. the charge of the oxygen atom changes
If the statement is false, then "This statement is false", is a lie, making it "This statement is true." The statement is now true. But if the statement is true, then "This statement is false" is true, making the statement false. But if the statement is false, then "This statement is false", is a lie, making it "This statement is true." The statement is now true. But if the statement is true, then... It's one of the biggest paradoxes ever, just like saying, "I'm lying right now."
Circular logic would be a statement or series of statements that are true because of another statement, which is true because of the first. For example, statement A is true because statement B is true. Statement B is true because statement A is true
No. I'm not sure it's even false. It's more a case of "this statement makes no sense whatsoever."
Subatomic particles are the same size as basketballs.
In computing, this is an AND statement.
always true
always true
The first two statement are false. The other one is true. There are electrons outside the nucleus, but they are much lighter than the particles in the nucleus.