answersLogoWhite

0

An anthropic principle is any of several similar explanations for the nature of the universe, which state that either the universe is as it is because otherwise we wouldn't be able to observe it, or that the presence of intelligent life constrains the universe to its current form.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How is the anthropic principle a challenge to naturalism?

TOE


Who discovered the anthropic?

anthropic principleThe anthropic principle is the philosophical argument apparently first stated by Brandon Carter, and popularized by Nick Bostrom.There are a variety of forms -- the weak anthropic principle, the strong anthropic principle, the final anthropic principle, etc.It may have implications for fundamental physics and cosmology.anthropic robotMany people have developed anthropic robots, also called androids.While artificial devices in more or less the shape of humans have stirred the imagination for centuries, perhaps the first bipedal walking robot was the 1995 Wabian from Waseda University.


How do you make a sentence using the word anthropic?

Part of the 'anthropic universe' theory surmises that stars only shine because there is a human eye to witness it's light.


Does the anthropic principle support god?

The anthropic principle suggests that the universe's physical constants and conditions are finely tuned to allow for the existence of life, particularly human life. Some interpret this fine-tuning as evidence of a designer or god, positing that such precision is unlikely to occur by chance. However, others argue that the principle does not necessarily imply a deity, as it may simply reflect the existence of multiple universes or other natural explanations. Ultimately, the anthropic principle can be interpreted in various ways, and its implications for the existence of god remain a topic of philosophical debate.


Is sun a main sequence star?

The lesser anthropic principle. Expanding on that a bit: if the Sun were NOT a main sequence star, we wouldn't be around to be asking the question.


How does the anthropic principle challenge evolution?

No form of the cosmological anthropic principle challenges evolution. Objective reality, as defined by science and rationality, confirms that our species emerged as part of living nature. You exist because it has taken an entire Universe some 13.7 billion years to produce you, and the variations of the Cosmological Anthropic Principle do not contradict the overwhelming evidence of current scientific knowledge. In fact, it is because the human mind evolved that we (humanity) are able to ask such questions. For those who have chosen to adopt a religions 'set of beliefs' that contradict reality this is an uncomfortable truth, but those adopt a pantheist spiritual path, such as Hinduism, Buddhism and so on (thought there are some simplistic belief-based sects amongst these religions) are able to accept a scientific, rational picture of reality, knowing the content of their religion is instead part of our 'experiential reality', like the experience of love. Spiritual experiences are real in this respect, but not part of objective reality. The Anthropic Principle, properly understood, allows for human interpretation whilst maintaining scientific and rational integrity.


What is an anthropic coincidence?

An anthropic coincidence is a coincidence in the known physical constraints within this world, the result of which means that life without it would be impossible.


Earth's most recent era is?

A new approach yields the Answer: Anthropic - the Era of Mankind.


What year was the anthropic universe theory invented?

The theory was announced in 1973, by Brandon Carter.


What types of task do anthropologists have?

anthropic means human, so anthropologists study human life


Will other galaxies ever be fit for life?

Yes. According to the Anthropic principle, Life is an essential part of the Universe and it was not an accident. "The Universe knew that we were coming..." or so I read once. If the constants of Phyics are exactly tuned to support life, then what would make our planet so special? Nothing. The Universe is full with life forms.


There was this 1970s principle that if scientific constants were fractionally off universe would be very different and was used to prove God exists who came up with it?

This is known as the Anthropic Principle. In 1961 Robert Dicke noted that the age of the universe as seen by us cannot be random. Rather, biological factors constrain the universe to be more or less in a "golden age," - neither too young nor too old. If the universe were one tenth as old as its present age, there would not have been sufficient time to build up enough heavier elements by stellar nuclear fusion. If the universe were 10 times older than it actually is, most stars would have turned into white dwarfs, and stable planetary systems would have already come to an end. Thus Dicke explained that there was a huge coincidence between large numbers constructed from the constants of physics and the age of the universe. This idea then spread so that by the 1980s many universal constants were realised to be not the result of simple coincidence or random, but seemed to be of values that enabled life to exist. Any tiny fluctuations outside these values would render the universe incapable of sustaining life. This Anthropic Principle became a tool in suggesting that Creation was not a random occurrence but that there was evidence of design in the universe. We are a long way from the Anthropic Principle 'proving' that there is a God, as the questioner suggests, but it does point in the direction of firm evidence that there is design as opposed to just chance in the observable universe.