The conclusion of the nuclear model is that an atom has a small, dense nucleus at its center containing positively charged protons and electrically neutral neutrons, with negatively charged electrons orbiting around it. This model explains the stability of atoms and the behavior of subatomic particles within them.
The conclusion was that the nucleus of an atom is small, dense, and positively charged, as most of the alpha particles passed through the gold foil with a minor deflection, indicating that the majority of the atom is empty space. This led to the development of the nuclear model of the atom.
The nuclear model shows that an atom has a small, dense nucleus at its center made up of protons and neutrons, with electrons orbiting around it in specific energy levels. This model explains the overall structure of an atom and how its subatomic particles are arranged.
The nuclear model was insufficient because it couldn't explain the stability of atoms with more than one electron. It also failed to account for the continuous spectrum of light emitted by atoms in contrast to the discrete emission lines predicted by the model. Lastly, the model couldn't explain the chemical properties and behavior of elements accurately.
Ernest Rutherford is credited with creating the nuclear model of an atom. In 1911, his gold foil experiment demonstrated that atoms have a small, positively charged nucleus surrounded by a cloud of negatively charged electrons. This model laid the foundation for our modern understanding of atomic structure.
The three subatomic models are the plum pudding model, the nuclear model, and the current model known as the quantum mechanical model. These models describe the structure of the atom and the arrangement of subatomic particles within it.
The conclusion based on the gold foil experiment is that atoms have a dense, positively charged nucleus at the center, with electrons orbiting around it in a mostly empty space. This led to the development of the nuclear model of the atom by Ernest Rutherford.
A scientific model is a theoretical explanation of some phenomenon; the model is the conclusion, it is not the steps by which the conclusion was reached. The sequence of reasoning would just be called a scientific argument.
The bad conclusion nuclear weapons brings.
Ernest Rutherford created the nuclear model of an atom!
lineaar relation
The information given to the general public (me & you) leads to the conclusion; North Korea has nuclear arms, but struggles to maintain the weapons.
The Thomson model, also known as the "plum pudding model," concluded that atoms are composed of a uniform positive charge with negatively charged electrons embedded within it, resembling a pudding with plums. This model suggested that the positive charge was spread throughout the atom, counterbalancing the negative charges of the electrons. However, it was later disproved by Rutherford's gold foil experiment, leading to the development of the nuclear model of the atom.
Rutherford
nuclear atom
You would not be able to obtain the fissile material necessary to build a working model of a nuclear power plant. You could build a model, for sure, but it would not be a working model.
There has not been nuclear warfare. There have been two nuclear attacks. Nuclear warfare denotes the use of nuclear weapons by both or all opposing sides. The only use of nuclear weapons in warfare were the two bombings by the US of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and it was the intent of the US to bring WW2 with Japan to a quicker conclusion.
the latest undiscovered elementary particle that completes the standard nuclear model for the nuclear structure