It must be moving
If an attempt is made to sell you a magnetic generator, on the claim that it will supply you with free energy, then that attempt constitutes a scam ... that is, an attempt to defraud you for the seller's benefit. If the magnetic generator is simply demonstrated, with no attempt to persuade you to do anything about it, then it's simply a magic show ... that is, an entertaining illusion. In either case, you must understand, even if it's not obvious to you, that the magnetic generator is not doing what the operator may claim it is doing, or what it may appear to be doing.
A magnetic domain is an atom or group of atoms within a material that have some kind of "net" or uniform electron motion. Let's look a bit more closely to see what that means and what the implications are. A fundamental property of any charged particle is that when it is in motion, it creates a magnetic field around its path of travel. Electrons are negatively charged particles, and they create electromagnetic fields about themselves as they move. We know that electrons orbit atomic nuclei, and they create magnetic fields while doing so. Let's keep going from there. If we take one or more atoms or groups of atoms and align them so that they have some kind of uniform electron motion, an overall magnetic field will be present in this region of the material. The individual magnetic fields of some electrons will be added together. The uniform motion of the electrons about atoms in this area creates a magnetic domain. In "regular" iron, these magnetic domains are randomly arranged. But if we align a large enough group of these magnetic domains, we'll have created a magnet.
Equipotential lines are lines that are perpendicular to the lines representing the electric field of a particle. A particle can travel freely of equipotential lines without doing any work.
Particle physicists doing research in quantum mechanics use particle accelerators, which are also called "atom smashers" or "colliders". These devices propel subatomic particles at high velocities and collide them with other subatomic particles, sometimes creating new elements, and recreating the properties of the early Universe, shortly after the Big Bang.
There is none. To study particle physics you use the whole machinery of quantum physics, but written down in a different way. That means particle physicists use the formalism of quantum field theory, which is a more powerful way of doing quantum mechanics, it's just more useful in this context.
It must be moving
A particle accelerator will provide a beam of charged particles, which are accelerated by a magnetic flux, a nuclear reactor will provide a flux of neutrons (which are uncharged). Depends what sort of experiment you are doing
Particle Man, Particle Man, doing the things a particle can.
from my experience no. the battery is charged by the charger so when u take out the batterys its not doing anything
A magnetic domain is an atom or group of atoms within a material that have some kind of "net" or uniform electron motion. Let's look a bit more closely to see what that means and what the implications are. A fundamental property of any charged particle is that when it is in motion, it creates a magnetic field around its path of travel. Electrons are negatively charged particles, and they create electromagnetic fields about themselves as they move. We know that electrons orbit atomic nuclei, and they create magnetic fields while doing so. Let's keep going from there. If we take one or more atoms or groups of atoms and align them so that they have some kind of uniform electron motion, an overall magnetic field will be present in this region of the material. The individual magnetic fields of some electrons will be added together. The uniform motion of the electrons about atoms in this area creates a magnetic domain. In "regular" iron, these magnetic domains are randomly arranged. But if we align a large enough group of these magnetic domains, we'll have created a magnet.
arson
experience doing what?
you can get arrested and charged
One answer to this is that there is no answer; it is just a fundamental property of, or equivalently part of the definition of, a magnetic field that it produces a force on a charged particle perpendicular to both the field and the particle's velocity. (Though the existence and properties of the magnetic field can be derived from the electric field in relativity.) However, if you're so inclined, this can also be seen by an argument from symmetry and energy conservation. Let's say there is a magnetic field parallel to a current flow, and let's say there's a force on the flowing particles which can be predicted mathematically from the field. Which direction is it in? By symmetry it must be either with or against the current. All directions perpendicular to the current and field are the same; there's no physical law that could choose between them. This also means the field is either doing work on the current or having work done on it. So which is it? Now consider how that magnetic field is generated. It must be generated by another current flowing perpendicular to the first one. Let the two currents be the same. Now we see that by a reflection and a rotation the two currents are interchangeable. So, if each generates a force on the other, either both the currents are doing work or both are having work done on them; either way this violates energy conservation and cannot be.
They were charged with robbing a Braintree Mass bank and killing a police officer.K
No. Not unless you re-offend by doing the same crime. Then you can charged agsin WITH THE NEW CRIME.
Depends on what you are doing on your iphone