Because the acceleration of objects free falling is consistent anywhere on earth, one can conclude that inertial and gravitational mass are equal.
As it turns out, inertial mass is equivalent to gravitational mass, so if you simply weigh an object, you can determine both its weight and its inertia. These are always in direct proportion; twice as much weight equals twice as much inertia. The main difference is that weight does change in different locations; an object can become weightless while in orbit, while inertia does not change. But here on the surface of the Earth, it is very simple to weigh an object and get a meaningful result which applies both to gravitational mass and inertial mass. If you were in orbit, then the problem becomes a bit trickier.
The simple answer is that the object moves at a constant velocity (or remains stationary if it wasn't moving). This is known as Newton's First Law.However, Newton's Laws only apply in what is known as an inertial reference frame. Unfortunately, the definition of an inertial reference frame is a reference frame in which Newton's Laws apply. But, in principle, if you took an object far away from everything, then the simple answer above would, in principle, be correct.
Gravitational force can be related to basketball by the simple fact that gravity is what causes the ball to go in the basket (of course if you shoot it right) after you shoot and also allows you to dribble.
It's simple. the answer is .... SCIENCE! :D
no gravitational force is a non contact... a simple proof to that is that the Earth's centre is attracting you towards itself without you being in contact with it... also Sun is able to attract the planets from such a large distance....
simple observation is the easy way you known of looking/checking something to known other is right or wroth
As it turns out, inertial mass is equivalent to gravitational mass, so if you simply weigh an object, you can determine both its weight and its inertia. These are always in direct proportion; twice as much weight equals twice as much inertia. The main difference is that weight does change in different locations; an object can become weightless while in orbit, while inertia does not change. But here on the surface of the Earth, it is very simple to weigh an object and get a meaningful result which applies both to gravitational mass and inertial mass. If you were in orbit, then the problem becomes a bit trickier.
Usually by simple observation.
Simple observation should give you the answer
hello
A simple way to describe this would be, an observation is what you see, and an interpretation is what you conclude about what you have seen. OR An observation is a fact, something your senses detect happening while an interpretation is what you make of it by what you have sensed with your senses.
The simple answer is that the object moves at a constant velocity (or remains stationary if it wasn't moving). This is known as Newton's First Law.However, Newton's Laws only apply in what is known as an inertial reference frame. Unfortunately, the definition of an inertial reference frame is a reference frame in which Newton's Laws apply. But, in principle, if you took an object far away from everything, then the simple answer above would, in principle, be correct.
at the center of the earth, simple pendulmn has not any gravitational force(if we thought,the earth is an etended object) so at the center the gravitational acceleation is about 'zero' and that's why pendulumn's time period is 'infinite'.
Gravitational force can be related to basketball by the simple fact that gravity is what causes the ball to go in the basket (of course if you shoot it right) after you shoot and also allows you to dribble.
Simple observation will indicate if the Betta is making bubbles. You will see them at the surface of the water.
base on all observation and essy to calculate, rigorousy defined .simple to understand .
By a simple observation; also a semisolid substance can flow without any stress.