M = M0 / sqrt( 1 - v2/c2 )
If M = 2M0 then
sqrt( 1 - v2/c2 ) = 0.5
( 1 - v2/c2 ) = 0.25
1 - 0.25 = 0.75 = v2/c2
v2 = 0.75 c2
v = sqrt(0.75) c = 0.866 c = 259,627,885 meters (161,325 miles) per second
Fasten your seat belt . . .-- If the particle has any mass when it's not moving, then that mass becomes greaterthe faster the particle moves.-- If the particle could be pushed to the speed of light, its mass would be infinite at that speed.-- But in order to make the particle move faster, you have to add energy to it. The more mass it has,the more energy you have to give it in order to make it move faster.-- Since its mass grows as it moves faster, the amount of energy it takes to make itgo faster also grows.-- If its mass is growing toward infinity, then the amount of energy you need to make itgo faster is also growing toward infinity.-- Since the mass would be infinite at the speed of light, you would need an infinite amountof energy to boost it to that speed.-- You don't have enough energy available to do the job, and you can''t get it.
No, because the orbital is really just an abraction - the electron isn't racing around the orbital like a racecar, so there isn't a speed. The orbital is a better measure of the electrons potential energy.
If the size of the particle increases, the speed of the particles will generally decrease. This is because the larger size results in increased mass and inertia, requiring more energy to move at the same speed. Additionally, larger particles may experience more collisions and interactions with other particles, further decreasing their speed.
A photon is said to be "massless", meaning that it has no REST MASS (of course, having energy, it also has an equivalent mass).In a vacuum, a photon can ONLY move at the so-called speed of light (about 300,000 km/second). "Regular" particles can ONLY move at sub-light speed. They can get close to the speed of light, but never quite reach it.
The relationship between the speed and mass of an object is that the speed of an object is affected by its mass. In general, the greater the mass of an object, the more force is needed to accelerate it to a certain speed. This means that objects with more mass require more energy to move at the same speed as objects with less mass.
No, remember Newton's Law E=MV2. So a particle with the same energy with double the mass would move 1/4 the speed.
Fasten your seat belt . . .-- If the particle has any mass when it's not moving, then that mass becomes greaterthe faster the particle moves.-- If the particle could be pushed to the speed of light, its mass would be infinite at that speed.-- But in order to make the particle move faster, you have to add energy to it. The more mass it has,the more energy you have to give it in order to make it move faster.-- Since its mass grows as it moves faster, the amount of energy it takes to make itgo faster also grows.-- If its mass is growing toward infinity, then the amount of energy you need to make itgo faster is also growing toward infinity.-- Since the mass would be infinite at the speed of light, you would need an infinite amountof energy to boost it to that speed.-- You don't have enough energy available to do the job, and you can''t get it.
what are particle that show comparasons of the speed at wich sound will move throught matirials ? what are particle that show comparasons of the speed at wich sound will move throught matirials ?
Yes it is..Therotically no object can move in the speed of light.But now scientists are trying to find the conditions for which a particle can move in the speed of light. No, anything massless can (and must!) move at c. No object carrying mass can ever move at c.
Nothing that has mass when it's stationary can move at the speed of light. Electrons can move at any lesser speed. In modern particle accelerators, they can be boosted to 0.99999c. But every additional ' 9 ' requires ten times as much energy as the previous one did.
In a vacuum, a photon can ONLY move at the speed of light. A regular particle can ONLY move at speeds less than the speed of light.
I believe this is usually stated as "It has no mass".All particles that move at the speed of light (so basically, photons and gravitons) have zero mass. That's the only way they can move at the speed of light; a massive object can only move at sub-light speed. To accelerate a massive particle (i.e., a particle with ANY positive mass) up to the speed of light would require an infinite amount of energy. The mass we are talking about is what some older text books, as well as popular science books, often call the "rest mass" - though modern scientists try to avoid this term.
The speed of light is the fastest any real particle can go (only massless particles like the photon can move at the speed of light, particles with nonzero mass must always move slower).However quantum mechanics allows virtual particles to move at any speed (even speeds much faster than the speed of light) but only if any such movement is undetectable (which is why they are called virtual).
No, because the orbital is really just an abraction - the electron isn't racing around the orbital like a racecar, so there isn't a speed. The orbital is a better measure of the electrons potential energy.
Well, if it is a particle of light (a photon) it takes about a second and a half. If it is any other particle, one that does not move at the speed of light, then you have to define a speed for it.
A particle with more energy will typically have a higher speed or greater mass compared to a particle with lower energy. This increased energy can result in more interactions with other particles and greater impact during collisions.
If the size of the particle increases, the speed of the particles will generally decrease. This is because the larger size results in increased mass and inertia, requiring more energy to move at the same speed. Additionally, larger particles may experience more collisions and interactions with other particles, further decreasing their speed.