There are three measurements referred to as "ton" -
Depends on the density of the bricks you are referring to. If one brick was one cubic meter and weighed a ton then your answer would be 1. Similarly if it took 3424 bricks to weigh a ton and they were all half a cubic meter, then your answer would be 1712 cubic meters. You require more information.
A ton, by a large amount. There are 1,016.047 kilograms in a UK ton, or 907.18 kg in a US ton, or 1,000 kg in a metric tonne.
A ton of feathers weighs the same as a ton of any other material, such as a ton of bricks. This is because a ton is a unit of weight that measures 2,000 pounds regardless of the material being weighed.
No, a ton of coal and a ton of bricks would both weigh the same amount, which is one ton. The weight is determined by the measurement unit (ton) and not the material being weighed.
This question has been answered to death on this website! To cut a long story short... Given that a ton of feathers and a ton of bricks are of equal mass, but differing volume (the feathers are much less dense, and thus more volumous):Assuming they are measured at the same location on Earth, the ton of feathers would displace more air (a fluid), creating greater upthrust, thus causing them to weigh less.So, a ton of bricks is heavier than a ton of feathers. (on Earth)
Neither, they both weigh a ton.
A ton of feathers and a ton of bricks both weigh the same: one ton. The difference lies in their volume and density, with feathers taking up much more space than bricks due to their lighter density. Regardless of the material, a ton is a ton.
It weighs a tonne.
a ton of fethers weighs the same as a ton of bricks so do the math
A ton is a measurement of the weight of an object. No matter what the object is, if two items weigh a ton, then they are equal. A ton of bricks weighs exactly the same as a ton of feathers.
A ton of rocks weighs more. Since they both weigh a ton, then they weigh the same.
As you said both are a ton so both will be weighing the same, one ton. (exception: a tonne (being 1,000 kg, ton is 2,000 lb))
Since thier both a ton...a ton is a ton...but if you're talking about MASS, its possible the bricks would have more as they are more dense. This is a trick question.
A ton of cotton and a ton of bricks both weigh the same amount, as they are both equivalent to 2,000 pounds. The difference lies in their volume and density, with cotton being less dense and occupying more space compared to bricks. Therefore, a ton of bricks would take up less space than a ton of cotton due to their differing densities.
well they would both be the same, as both would have the weight of one tone. however the answer that i believe that you want is that you would need a lot more bricks to make one tone than gold as gold is a lot denser.
both
OK, take an average house brick (is there such a thing?) which weighs about 6 pound 8 oz (2.9K), and then using the English (long) ton which is 2240, you get approx 340 bricks to the ton I reckon -Using the US (short) ton which is 2000 pounds, there are approximately 305 bricks to the ton.As an aside, if you have a 6 yard builders skip that you are filling up you can load about 7 tons max. , that's 2380 bricks, quite few then.