0
What else can I help you with?
Would a smooth even surface weather faster than an uneven broken surface?
An uneven broken surface would generally weather faster than a smooth even surface due to increased surface area and exposure to environmental factors. The irregularities in the broken surface provide more opportunities for weathering processes, such as erosion and chemical breakdown, to occur compared to a smooth surface.
If a person in front of a smooth surface from which a sound is reflected the person would hear a sound that?
If a person is in front of a smooth surface from which a sound is reflected, the person would hear a sound that ====================================================== Allow me to add(: SEEMS TO COME FROM BEHIND THE SURFACE:>
What type of surface rough or smooth would absorb and radiate heat more rapidly?
A rough surface would absorb and radiate heat more rapidly compared to a smooth surface. This is because a rough surface has more surface area in contact with the surrounding environment, allowing for more efficient transfer of heat through conduction and radiation.
What tunic is smooth surface and decreases friction?
A tunic made of silk would have a smooth surface and would decrease friction due to its sleek texture. Silk is known for its soft, smooth feel against the skin, making it a good choice to reduce friction when worn as a tunic.
Would a smooth even surface weather faster than according to uneven broken surface?
A smooth even surface would typically weather more slowly than an uneven broken surface because there are fewer areas for water to collect and penetrate, leading to less erosion and weathering. The irregularities on a broken surface provide more surface area for exposure to weathering agents, causing faster deterioration.
What would happen to your body's absorption rate of the intestines if villi had no microvilli?
If the villi of the intestines had no microvilli, the absorption rate of the intestines would be significantly reduced. Microvilli are tiny finger-like projections on the surface of the villi that increase the surface area for absorption. Without microvilli, there would be less surface area available for nutrients to be absorbed into the bloodstream, leading to a decrease in absorption efficiency.
What would happen if a villi was destroyed?
If a villi in the small intestine is destroyed, it will lead to a decrease in the surface area available for nutrient absorption. This can result in malabsorption of nutrients such as carbohydrates, fats, and proteins, leading to nutritional deficiencies and related health issues.
What would happen to our body's absorption rate of the intestines if villi had no microvilli?
it goes down
Can you live without villi?
No, villi are essential for nutrient absorption in the small intestine. Without villi, nutrients would not be absorbed properly, leading to malnutrition and other health issues.
What would happen if there was no villi in humans body?
The villi vastly increase the effective surface area of the small intestine, allowing nutrients to be rapidly absorbed. Without them, the process would take longer, perhaps prohibitively longer. If the reduction in surface meant slower motion of the food, it might become necessary to eat more frequently to provide the same nutrients, and this would also mean more food bulk within the intestines at any given time. This can already be observed in individuals who have lost part of their digestive systems to injury or disease, and have to adjust their type of food intake (predigested) or limit their activities because insufficient calories are absorbed in the jejunum.
What do villi do in the small intestine?
Surface area is the amount of surface that is exposed in a space. For instance, a sheet of flat paper covers the same amount of area as a bigger piece of crumpled up paper, but the bigger piece of paper has more surface area. Folding and crumpling surfaces up makes it easy to fit more surface area into a smaller space. Since villi are very tiny folds that stick out from the small intestines, more surface area is fit inside a smaller space. If you were to "flatten out" all the little villi of the small intestines it would cover a football field. Not so if the inside of the intestine were smooth.
What is the function of an epithelium that is smooth on its free surface compared to an epithelium with a folded free surface made up of micro-villi?
Secretion is one of epithelium's major functions. However, if there are microvilli, they are used for absorption. Regular epithelium would be in our skin, and epithelium with microvilli would be in the digestive tract.
Would a paper towel best represent the villi?
No, a paper towel would not be a good representation of villi. Villi are finger-like projections in the lining of the small intestine that increase surface area for nutrient absorption. A better comparison would be to think of villi as tiny shaggy carpet fibers that help in absorbing nutrients from food passing through the intestine.
What happens if the small intestine was smooth rather than covered with villi?
You would slowly starve and die, no matter how much you ate.
Fingerlike projections in the intestines that absorb food?
-Villi The first answer is correct in the villi are very small finger like projections in the intestines but I would suspect the question refers to the appendix.
When people eat foods made of wheat a reaction destroys the villi in the small intestine what problem would you expect these people to experience?
IF the villi disappeared, THEN the patient would suffer from malnutrition, as the surface area would be markedly reduced. BUT why should wheat cause such a reaction?
Why would your digestive system be less efficent if your small intestines had no villi?
Villi provide much more surface area to absorb nutrients. Without them, either digestion would take a very long time or much of the nutritional value of food would be lost.
