If a person were to shrink, their physical proportions would become smaller, potentially leading to changes in their overall health and well-being. However, the specific implications would depend on how much they shrank and whether their internal organs were affected. This could impact their ability to function properly and could have significant consequences on their daily life.
If you were inside a concave (or convex) spherical mirror, you would see a distorted and magnified (or shrunk) version of your own reflection. The image formed would depend on the type of mirror and your position inside it.
1. You wouldn't have any electric 2. Nothing would happen as there is no air in space.
Cutting a piece of glass into four smaller pieces would not change the density of the glass. Density is a property of the material itself and remains constant regardless of its shape or size.
If acceleration didn't exist, objects would either be at rest or move at a constant speed in a straight line. There would be no change in velocity over time, and thus no ability to start, stop, or change direction. This would greatly impact motion and dynamics in the universe as we know it.
This scenario is considered a paradox, as an irresistible force cannot exist alongside an immovable object in classical physics. It raises questions about the nature of the concept of an immovable object and an irresistible force.
hi
it wold bolck most of the htsuns lig
Depends what you're asking...If the earth was smaller but not you, you would weigh the same. It's just like if the USA or Britain smaller than now or shrunk, we would be the same.
If the airship is shrunk by an enemy, the volume of the gas inside the airship will reduce in proportion to the shrinkage of the airship. The gas molecules will be more compressed, leading to an increase in pressure within the airship.
The dress has shrunk.
If Jupiter's radius was shrunk by 96%, then it would be 1,738 miles (2,797 km), still being larger than Mercury.
The Earth's radius would be a mere 158 miles (254 km) if it was shrunk by 96%, remaining large enough to maintain its hydrostatic equilibrium.
Yes, as the grvity would be lowered.
The correct past tense is "have shrunk." "Shrunk" is the correct past participle form of the verb "shrink."
for his shrunk part of leg between the knee & ankle shrunk is past form of shrink
Shrunk is the past tense of shrink.
_ My new clothes shrunk when i put them in the washer.