0
What else can I help you with?
If an object is not moving does it have balanced or unbalanced forces upon it?
Balanced forces, by definition, have a net force of zero. That is, they are forces acting on an object which counteract each other, resulting in zero movement for the object in question.
Is it possible for an object at rest to have forces acting upon it?
Yes, an object at rest can still have forces acting upon it. These forces may include gravitational forces, normal forces, frictional forces, or applied forces. These forces can either be balanced, resulting in the object remaining at rest, or unbalanced, causing the object to start moving.
Is it possible for an object to not be in motion and still have forces acting on it?
Yes, it is possible for an object to not be in motion and still have forces acting on it. This situation could occur if the forces acting on the object are balanced, resulting in a state of equilibrium where there is no net force causing motion.
What is an essential characteristic of an object in equilibrium?
what is an essential characteristic of an object in equilibrium
What will happen when to an object if the forces acting on it are balanced?
If the forces acting on an object are balanced, the object will remain at rest or continue to move at a constant velocity. This is in accordance with Newton's First Law of Motion, which states that an object in equilibrium will remain in equilibrium unless acted upon by an unbalanced force.
If an object is not moving does it have balanced or unbalanced forces upon it?
Balanced forces, by definition, have a net force of zero. That is, they are forces acting on an object which counteract each other, resulting in zero movement for the object in question.
Is it possible for an object at rest to have forces acting upon it?
Yes, an object at rest can still have forces acting upon it. These forces may include gravitational forces, normal forces, frictional forces, or applied forces. These forces can either be balanced, resulting in the object remaining at rest, or unbalanced, causing the object to start moving.
Is it possible for an object to not be in motion and still have forces acting on it?
Yes, it is possible for an object to not be in motion and still have forces acting on it. This situation could occur if the forces acting on the object are balanced, resulting in a state of equilibrium where there is no net force causing motion.
What is an essential characteristic of an object in equilibrium?
what is an essential characteristic of an object in equilibrium
What will happen when to an object if the forces acting on it are balanced?
If the forces acting on an object are balanced, the object will remain at rest or continue to move at a constant velocity. This is in accordance with Newton's First Law of Motion, which states that an object in equilibrium will remain in equilibrium unless acted upon by an unbalanced force.
When forces are acting upon something motion occurs if?
Assuming this is a vacuum: Motion would occur only if there is no secondly force acting on the object with the same magnitude(strength) but has the opposite direction to the force you're acting upon this object.
One of the conditions necessary for an object to be in equilibrium when acted upon by a number of parallel forces is that the vector sum of the forces is what?
The vector sum of the forces must be zero for an object to be in equilibrium when acted upon by a number of parallel forces. This means that the forces are balanced and there is no net force acting on the object in any direction.
What do you get when you combine all the forces acting upon an object?
The net force acting on the object.
What occurs forces acting upon a body are not balanced?
The body accelerates.
Is it possible for an object not to be in motion and still have a force acting on it?
Yes, the object can have equal forces acting in opposite directions: 5N ->[]<- 5N The object will have forces acting upon it, but will not move.
What does the unbalanced force exerted on object at rest?
When an object is at rest, the forces acting upon it are balanced - there are no unbalanced forces.
If the force acting upon an object are balanced then the object Amust not be moving Bmust be miving with constant velocity Cmust not be accelerating Dnone of these?
If the force acting upon an object are balanced then the object must not be accelerating
