0
What else can I help you with?
What has a greater effect on an objects kinetic energy doubling its mass or doubling it's speed?
Doubling the speed of an object has a greater effect on its kinetic energy than doubling its mass. The kinetic energy of an object is proportional to the square of its speed, but only linearly related to its mass. Therefore, an increase in speed will have a greater impact on the object's kinetic energy.
How would doubling the mass of an object change the object's potential energy?
Doubling the mass of an object would double its potential energy as long as the height or position of the object remains constant. Potential energy is directly proportional to mass when height is a constant factor.
What will happen to kinetic energy of the object if its mass is doubled but the velocity remains the same?
If the mass of the object is doubled but the velocity remains the same, the kinetic energy of the object will also double. Kinetic energy is directly proportional to the mass of the object, so doubling the mass will result in a doubling of kinetic energy.
What effect does a doubling of the mass have upon the acceleration of the object?
If the force applied remains constant, doubling the mass of an object will result in half the acceleration compared to the original value. This is due to the inverse relationship between mass and acceleration according to Newton's second law, where acceleration is inversely proportional to mass.
Which would have greater effect on kinetic energy of an object doubling the mass or doubling the velocity?
Doubling the velocity would have a greater effect on the kinetic energy of an object. The kinetic energy of an object is directly proportional to the square of its velocity, while it is only linearly proportional to its mass. Therefore, increasing the velocity has a more significant impact on the kinetic energy.
What has a greater effect on an objects kinetic energy doubling its mass or doubling it's speed?
Doubling the speed of an object has a greater effect on its kinetic energy than doubling its mass. The kinetic energy of an object is proportional to the square of its speed, but only linearly related to its mass. Therefore, an increase in speed will have a greater impact on the object's kinetic energy.
How would doubling the mass of an object change the object's potential energy?
Doubling the mass of an object would double its potential energy as long as the height or position of the object remains constant. Potential energy is directly proportional to mass when height is a constant factor.
What will happen to kinetic energy of the object if its mass is doubled but the velocity remains the same?
If the mass of the object is doubled but the velocity remains the same, the kinetic energy of the object will also double. Kinetic energy is directly proportional to the mass of the object, so doubling the mass will result in a doubling of kinetic energy.
Is doubling a kinetic energy source by mass bigger than when you double its speed?
Doubling the speed of an object results in a fourfold increase in kinetic energy, while doubling the mass only results in a doubling of kinetic energy. Therefore, doubling the speed will result in a bigger increase in kinetic energy compared to doubling the mass.
How does mass and velocity effect energy?
The kinetic energy of an object is directly proportional to its mass and also to the square of its velocity. This means that the higher the mass and the velocity of an object, the higher its kinetic energy will be. Therefore, doubling the mass of an object will double its kinetic energy, while doubling the velocity of an object will quadruple its kinetic energy.
What effect does a doubling of the mass have upon the acceleration of the object?
If the force applied remains constant, doubling the mass of an object will result in half the acceleration compared to the original value. This is due to the inverse relationship between mass and acceleration according to Newton's second law, where acceleration is inversely proportional to mass.
Which would have greater effect on kinetic energy of an object doubling the mass or doubling the velocity?
Doubling the velocity would have a greater effect on the kinetic energy of an object. The kinetic energy of an object is directly proportional to the square of its velocity, while it is only linearly proportional to its mass. Therefore, increasing the velocity has a more significant impact on the kinetic energy.
When the mass of a moving object is doubled and its speed remains the same its momentum?
When the mass of a moving object is doubled and its speed remains the same, its momentum also doubles. Momentum is directly proportional to mass, so doubling the mass will result in a doubling of the momentum regardless of the speed.
Mass of an object is doubled at what speed?
The speed of an object does not change if only its mass is doubled. The speed of an object is determined by its velocity, which is independent of its mass. However, doubling the mass of an object will affect its momentum and kinetic energy.
When you double the force acting on an object and keep the mass of the cart constant the acceleration is?
Doubled. According to Newton's second law of motion, acceleration is directly proportional to the net force acting on an object when mass is constant. Therefore, doubling the force will lead to a doubling of acceleration.
Does a 2 kg solid iron brick have twice as much mass as a 1 kg solid iron?
Yes, a 2 kg iron brick has twice as much mass as a 1 kg iron brick. Mass is a measure of the amount of matter in an object, so doubling the mass means doubling the amount of matter present in the object.
Which would have greater effect on kinetic energy of an object - doubling the mass or doubling the velocity?
Doubling mass affects kinetic energy in that the greater the mass, the greater the kinetic energy. OK, but if you have a 10kg mass traveling at 2m/s and it bumps into and sticks to a 10g mass, the resultant speed would be 1m/s. The momentum stays the same. KE before is 10*2*2/2= 20, while the KE after is 20*1*1/2= 10. So it is not that the above answer is wrong, but rather, you question is not clear.
