There are many applications that would benefit from less friction. Any kind of motion where heat is produced but not intended would benefit from less friction.
Some examples:
1. the contact point between the piston and wall in an engine produces less heat and more power with less friction
2. air flow over a car's exterior, over a plane's exterior, over a rockets exterior results in reduced drag (air resistance) with less friction
3. the space shuttle could definitely use less friction with the atmosphere during re-rentry
4. electrical conductors are more efficient as friction decreases
5. if friction were 0, the perpetual motion machine would be possible
Activities like driving, exercising, and collaborating with others would benefit from less friction.
You would want to maximize area of contact, and for air friction you would want to maximise the area facing the wind, or direction of motion, Either way the most friction is had from a sheet, provided it can be kept in the right orientation.
If you were roller-skating you don't need friction because it slows you down. Well you want friction between the wheels and the floor (so you do not slip sideways) but not between the wheel and the axel (thats why you have ball bearings there to reduce rolling friction). If you are ice skating you do not want friction between the blade of your skates and the ice.
Without friction, it would be difficult to walk, drive, or hold objects in place. Machines would not work efficiently and sports would be very different. Overall, life would be more challenging and less predictable without friction.
In the context of friction, "little" would typically mean that there is not much resistance or opposition between two surfaces in contact. This would result in smoother movement and less energy loss due to friction.
Activities like driving, exercising, and collaborating with others would benefit from less friction.
You want less friction. Then you will go faster.
Because if there is less friction, the road would be very slippery, therefore more dangerous
If you want to swim faster, then decreasing friction would help you with that - Less friction means you glide easer through the water. If you want a more efficient workout then increasing friction would help you with that. If you were to put a track suit on before entering the water you'd have to work a lot harder for each lap in the pool.
You would want to maximize area of contact, and for air friction you would want to maximise the area facing the wind, or direction of motion, Either way the most friction is had from a sheet, provided it can be kept in the right orientation.
If you were roller-skating you don't need friction because it slows you down. Well you want friction between the wheels and the floor (so you do not slip sideways) but not between the wheel and the axel (thats why you have ball bearings there to reduce rolling friction). If you are ice skating you do not want friction between the blade of your skates and the ice.
less friction then what?
no limiting friction is not less than rolling friction
The force of friction ALWAYS acts in the direction exactly opposite to the directionin which the object is moving.If the friction force acted in the same direction as the object's motion, then youwould want to have as much friction as possible, because that would help youmove the object with less fuel.
Braking. Driving on ice.
Friction
Without friction, it would be difficult to walk, drive, or hold objects in place. Machines would not work efficiently and sports would be very different. Overall, life would be more challenging and less predictable without friction.