you could say it because wind,wave,solar,hydroelectric do depend on the sun.
but natural gas, tidal, geothermal don't.
fossil fuels are coal, oil, natural gas.
When energy transformations are not efficient, it means that there is a significant amount of energy lost as waste during the process. This can result in lower overall productivity and increased costs due to the inefficient use of energy. Improving the efficiency of energy transformations can help conserve resources and reduce environmental impact.
Renewable energy resources refer to sources of energy that can be naturally replenished, such as sunlight, wind, and biomass. While energy cannot be created or destroyed according to the law of conservation of energy, renewable energy resources can be harnessed and converted into usable forms of energy without depleting the source. This distinguishes them from non-renewable energy sources like fossil fuels, which are finite and, once used, cannot be easily replaced within a human lifetime.
I wouldn't say that electrical energy "uses" other types of energy; probably you mean that you can convert other types of energy to electrical energy. Most types of energy can be converted to electrical energy, or actually all of them (as long as there is some useful energy left) - including heat energy, nuclear energy, chemical energy, mechanical energy, etc.
The movement of the water means there is kinetic energy. This is a kind of mechanical energy.By the way, it is incorrect to say that the river ismechanical energy. This sounds as if the river were only energy, and nothing else. You might say that the river hasmechanical energy.The movement of the water means there is kinetic energy. This is a kind of mechanical energy.By the way, it is incorrect to say that the river ismechanical energy. This sounds as if the river were only energy, and nothing else. You might say that the river hasmechanical energy.The movement of the water means there is kinetic energy. This is a kind of mechanical energy.By the way, it is incorrect to say that the river ismechanical energy. This sounds as if the river were only energy, and nothing else. You might say that the river hasmechanical energy.The movement of the water means there is kinetic energy. This is a kind of mechanical energy.By the way, it is incorrect to say that the river ismechanical energy. This sounds as if the river were only energy, and nothing else. You might say that the river hasmechanical energy.
The word for energy in Hawaiian is "mana."
Plants require sunlight to grow. Other forms of life eat plants.
I would say "That is a true statement!"
why are ecomics scarce?
I would say, all types.
Because plants get energy from the sun, herbivores eat the plants, and carnivores eat the herbivores. Sunlight is at the bottom of the food-chain. Life depends on solar light as it is converted to energy, in the process of photosynthesis, for others to absorb through consumption.
well all that ik is that resources say it was about 3000 b.c
To all who will sincerely seek the Kingdom of God and HIS righteousness all these things will be added to them
convention resource is a non renewable source of energy it in cludes all those resources which sre used in everyday life. ex:wood, petroleum.
I'd say they depend on water.
It depends on the type of energy, of course.Gravitational potential energy is equal to weight multiplied by height - so you can see that it is directly proportional to weight.Some other types of energy, such as kinetic energy, heat energy, etc., depend on the mass of an object - not on its weight. But since weight is also directly proportional to the mass, you might say that if the weight increases, certain types of energy will also increase - even though the energy is not exactly the result of the weight in this case (both the weight and the energy depend on the mass).
If we are set on species suicide we should consume all of out natural non-renewable resources as quickly as possible. This will ensure we have no energy, maximize climate change to create drought and famine and generally bring an end to our civilization.
I would say non-relativistic total energy. The energy related to motion is kinetic energy; The stored energy in the particles is potential energy.