0
It takes more force to get an object moving because you need to overcome its initial inertia, which is the resistance of the object to changes in its motion. Once the object is moving, it requires less force to keep it in motion because there is less resistance once it has overcome the inertia.
What else can I help you with?
Why is it harder to get an object to start moving then it is to keep the object moving?
It is harder to get an object to start moving because overcoming static friction requires more force than maintaining its motion due to kinetic friction. Static friction is stronger initially but once the object is in motion, it requires less force to keep it moving due to kinetic friction being lower.
Why is less force needed to keep an object moving than to start the object in motion?
1). Because maintaining an object in motion requires no force, but causing a non-moving object to move involves acceleration which does require force. 2). Because kinetic friction is generally less than static friction.
Does it take the same amount of force to start something as it does to keep it moving?
No. It takes a force to put something in motion, and it takes force to stop it. To keep it moving requires zero force. If there is no opposing friction force, it will continue moving forever. If you can significantly reduce the friction, a small force can keep an object moving - just enough to counteract the force of friction.No. It takes a force to put something in motion, and it takes force to stop it. To keep it moving requires zero force. If there is no opposing friction force, it will continue moving forever. If you can significantly reduce the friction, a small force can keep an object moving - just enough to counteract the force of friction.No. It takes a force to put something in motion, and it takes force to stop it. To keep it moving requires zero force. If there is no opposing friction force, it will continue moving forever. If you can significantly reduce the friction, a small force can keep an object moving - just enough to counteract the force of friction.No. It takes a force to put something in motion, and it takes force to stop it. To keep it moving requires zero force. If there is no opposing friction force, it will continue moving forever. If you can significantly reduce the friction, a small force can keep an object moving - just enough to counteract the force of friction.
Is it true that take the same amount of force to start something moving as does to keep it moving?
It requires more force to start an object than to keep it sliding because you need a strong push to slide the box and once the box starts sliding, the friction of the floor acts between the floor and the bottom surface of the box
Does it take more force to accelerate a moving object?
No, it takes the same force to accelerate a moving object as it does to accelerate a stationary object, according to Newton's first law of motion. The force required depends on the mass of the object and the desired acceleration.
Why do you have to exert extra force to get a heavy object moving and then have to keep applying force to keep it moving at constant velocity?
the heavier and the bigger the object the more force you need to use to keep it moving . the less weight and the smaller an object is the less force you need to use to keep it moving. it always depends on the weight of the object and the size of the object.
Why a horse has to apply more force to start a Tonga than to keep is moving?
Because of friction. Every object has 2 friction coefficient values (called Mu and with its own symbol) - one stationary, and the other while the object is moving. It always takes more force (N) to move an object from a stand-still then it does to keep the same object moving.
Why is it harder to get an object to start moving then it is to keep the object moving?
It is harder to get an object to start moving because overcoming static friction requires more force than maintaining its motion due to kinetic friction. Static friction is stronger initially but once the object is in motion, it requires less force to keep it moving due to kinetic friction being lower.
Why is less force needed to keep an object moving than to start the object in motion?
1). Because maintaining an object in motion requires no force, but causing a non-moving object to move involves acceleration which does require force. 2). Because kinetic friction is generally less than static friction.
Does it take the same amount of force to start something as it does to keep it moving?
No. It takes a force to put something in motion, and it takes force to stop it. To keep it moving requires zero force. If there is no opposing friction force, it will continue moving forever. If you can significantly reduce the friction, a small force can keep an object moving - just enough to counteract the force of friction.No. It takes a force to put something in motion, and it takes force to stop it. To keep it moving requires zero force. If there is no opposing friction force, it will continue moving forever. If you can significantly reduce the friction, a small force can keep an object moving - just enough to counteract the force of friction.No. It takes a force to put something in motion, and it takes force to stop it. To keep it moving requires zero force. If there is no opposing friction force, it will continue moving forever. If you can significantly reduce the friction, a small force can keep an object moving - just enough to counteract the force of friction.No. It takes a force to put something in motion, and it takes force to stop it. To keep it moving requires zero force. If there is no opposing friction force, it will continue moving forever. If you can significantly reduce the friction, a small force can keep an object moving - just enough to counteract the force of friction.
What are the conditions for an object to stay at rest to keep moving velocity or to move with increasing velocity?
The condition for an object to stay at rest or if moving, keep moving at a constantvelocity is that the sum of forces acting on the object be zero or that no force actson the object.For an object to increase its velocity, in other words to accelerate, there has to bea force acting on the object. The force is the one responsible for the accelerationof the object. Recall Newton's 2nd law of motion:F = m∙awhere 'F' is the force acting on the object with mass 'm', and 'a' is the acceleration the object experiences.Read more: What_are_the_conditions_for_an_object_to_stay_at_rest_to_keep_moving_at_constant_velocity_or_to_move_with_increasing_to_velocity
Is it true that take the same amount of force to start something moving as does to keep it moving?
It requires more force to start an object than to keep it sliding because you need a strong push to slide the box and once the box starts sliding, the friction of the floor acts between the floor and the bottom surface of the box
Why does it make more energy to stop a moving ball than the energy required to keep it moving?
The natural tendency of a moving object is to keep moving. And it doesn't really require energy to stop it; in fact, in theory, you can gain energy from it. What is required is a force.
Does it take more force to accelerate a moving object?
No, it takes the same force to accelerate a moving object as it does to accelerate a stationary object, according to Newton's first law of motion. The force required depends on the mass of the object and the desired acceleration.
How can a force affect moving object?
because the force pulls up the moving object and it stops When a force is applied to a body, the body gets acceleration or retardation. so the moving object may move faster or may stop. when there is no force, the moving object will move with a constant velocity.
How does adding and removing of force affect a moving object and an object at rest?
For an object in motion, a force applied in the direction of the movement of the object would propel it further along that direction. The force should be equal or more than the momentum of the object. If a force in applied against the moving object in a direction opposite to the movement of the object, the velocity of the moving object is hampered. How much this decrease in velocity would occur would depend on the amount of the opposing force. If a sufficiently large force in an opposing direction is applied, it can even stop the object. If the force is not along or opposite the movement of the object, the force can change the direction of the object. If the force that was causing the movement of the object is removed, the object slows down, until it finally stops. For an object at rest, a sufficient amount of force can set the object in motion.
Is a force required to keep an object moving in a given direction?
For our purposes here on everyday Earth, yes it is. This may seem to break Newton's first law of motion (i.e., an object in motion tends to stay in motion until an outside force acts upon it.) at first, but that works best in a vacuum away from other forces. On Earth, we have gravity, friction, wind resistance, and so forth that can easily slow something down and stop it in time. So, with all of the opposing forces acting against your object on the average planet, you will need more force to keep it moving.
