The question is not clear. Same as what?
No, changing the mass of a free-falling body does not affect the value of the acceleration due to gravity. The acceleration due to gravity is a constant value that is independent of the mass of the object. All objects fall at the same rate in a vacuum due to gravity.
g is directly proptional to mass of earth. if the mass of eath will be increase mass of g will be also increase.If the mass of earth will be decrease the mass of g will bi also decrease.If the mass of earth will increase four times then the mass of g will be also increase four times. G is a gravitational contant.it remain same throughout the universe if the mass of earth will become four times,the value of G will not change it will remain the same as it is a constant.its value is 6.67x 10^-11 N-M^/KG
If the density remains the same and the thickness of the coin is doubled, the mass of the coin would also double. This is because density is mass divided by volume, and if the thickness (volume) is doubled while density remains constant, the mass must double to maintain the same density value.
Decreasing the mass of an object while keeping its volume constant will increase its density. Density is calculated by dividing mass by volume, so as mass decreases and volume remains the same, the density value will increase.
The velocity of a mass on a spring is at its maximum value when the mass passes through its equilibrium position.
By their very definition, mass and weight cannot be the same. If you were to go to a planetoid whose radius was the same as the earth's radius but the mass was approx a tenth of the earth's mass, then the mass and weight of an object on its surface would have the same numeric value. However, because they are measures of different things, the fact that they have the same numeric value does not mean that they are the same: 5 seconds and 5 kilograms have the same numeric value but nobody (in their right mind) would argue that 5 seconds = 5 kilograms.
If we assume that the mass of paper is the same in a bill of each denomination, andthe mass of ink in each is also the same, then the value of any mass of $10-bills is10 times the value of the same mass of $1-bills.So the difference in their value is nine times the number of bills in either pile.
Equivalent in what?The mass should be almost the same, since milk consists mainly of water.The nutritional value, of course, is not the same.Equivalent in what?The mass should be almost the same, since milk consists mainly of water.The nutritional value, of course, is not the same.Equivalent in what?The mass should be almost the same, since milk consists mainly of water.The nutritional value, of course, is not the same.Equivalent in what?The mass should be almost the same, since milk consists mainly of water.The nutritional value, of course, is not the same.
Amount can be a value in money terms, or the mass of an object. Neither is a capacity.Amount can be a value in money terms, or the mass of an object. Neither is a capacity.Amount can be a value in money terms, or the mass of an object. Neither is a capacity.Amount can be a value in money terms, or the mass of an object. Neither is a capacity.
... the same as the mass of the same man anywhere else.
Density is mass divided by volume. If we assume the mass of the iron and the cotton is the same, you will find that the iron will occupy less space (less volume) than that of the cotton. The value of a mass divided by a small volume is higher than the value of the same mass divided by a larger volume. If we assume the volume of both the iron and the cotton is the same, you will also find that the mass of the iron will be higher than the mass of the cotton. The value of a large mass divided by a volume is larger than the value of a small mass divided by the same volume. In both assumptions, the value of mass divided by volume for the iron is higher than the value of mass divided by volume for the cotton. Since density is mass divided by volume, the density of iron is therefore higher than the density of cotton.
No, changing the mass of a free-falling body does not affect the value of the acceleration due to gravity. The acceleration due to gravity is a constant value that is independent of the mass of the object. All objects fall at the same rate in a vacuum due to gravity.
g is directly proptional to mass of earth. if the mass of eath will be increase mass of g will be also increase.If the mass of earth will be decrease the mass of g will bi also decrease.If the mass of earth will increase four times then the mass of g will be also increase four times. G is a gravitational contant.it remain same throughout the universe if the mass of earth will become four times,the value of G will not change it will remain the same as it is a constant.its value is 6.67x 10^-11 N-M^/KG
If the density remains the same and the thickness of the coin is doubled, the mass of the coin would also double. This is because density is mass divided by volume, and if the thickness (volume) is doubled while density remains constant, the mass must double to maintain the same density value.
Decreasing the mass of an object while keeping its volume constant will increase its density. Density is calculated by dividing mass by volume, so as mass decreases and volume remains the same, the density value will increase.
When atomic mass is expressed in unified atomic mass units, it is similar to isotopic mass and has the same numerical value as that of atomic mass. The atomic mass or the relative isotopic mass is the mass of one atom which at a time can be only one isotope.
No, a balance would not give the same value for mass if used on the Moon. While mass remains constant regardless of location, the weight measured by a balance would differ due to the Moon's weaker gravitational pull, which is about one-sixth that of Earth's. However, if using a balance that compares two masses (like a beam balance), the mass measurement would remain the same on both the Moon and Earth.